|
Advice Beginners BIOS Guide CPUs Links Mainboards Memory Network Storage Video/Sound Cards Contact Forum SiteMap Sponsors WebNews Home |
. | . |
Prices: Mainboards ABIT ASUS Chaintech Shuttle Soyo Tyan CPU Intel P4 2.4C-800 P4 2.6C-800 P4 2.8C-800 P4 3.0-800 P4 3.2-800 AMD AthlonXP XP 1700+ XP 2000+ XP 2400+ XP 2500+ XP 2700+ XP 3000+ XP 3200+ Athlon64 Athlon64 3200+ Athlon64 FX-51 Opteron Opteron 240 Opteron 242 Opteron 244 Opteron 246 Memory Corsair Crucial Kingston Mushkin OCZ |
|
|
|
LOSTCIRCUITS
|
|
| AMD's Brisbane Core - the Transition to 65 nm And the cache latency | |
|
(Author: MS, January 5, 2007) |
3D Rendering
Caligari TrueSpace
We are using our own established "Vases" Benchmark (supplied by Adam Trachtenberg) at 1024 x 768 with Raytracing and 2xAA enabled. TrueSpace 5.1 scales almost linearly with clock frequency and numbers of cores but is also sensitive to cache size and latencies as well as memory bandwidth.
Render Time

Render time in seconds: lower is better! To make a comparison between the Windsor and the Brisbane core easier, we have labeled the Brisbane core with an * whereas any other core is just listed by model number. The green arrows point at a hypothetical Brisbane 4600* and a Windsor 4600+ in otherwise identical system configuration. In this case, the 65 nm CPU is marginally faster than the older 90 nm part.
Render Power
How much CPU electrical power does it take to render the entire scene? Check the graph below:

Power consumption [W]: lower is better
The total power consumption is a composite score factoring in the render time and the power draw recorded during the render pass. Therefore, either a shorter render time or else a lower power draw can positively impact the outcome of the results.
next page: => POV-Ray,Cinebench2003 =>
All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!