Navigate: Advice Beginners BIOS Guide CPUs Links Mainboards Memory Network Storage Video/Sound Cards Contact Forum SiteMap Sponsors WebNews Home	.	.
Prices: Mainboards ABIT ASUS Chaintech Shuttle Soyo Tyan CPU Intel P4 2.4C-800 P4 2.6C-800 P4 2.8C-800 P4 3.0-800 P4 3.2-800 AMD AthlonXP XP 1700+ XP 2000+ XP 2400+ XP 2500+ XP 2700+ XP 3000+ XP 3200+ Athlon64 Athlon64 3200+ Athlon64 FX-51 Opteron Opteron 240 Opteron 242 Opteron 244 Opteron 246 Memory Corsair Crucial Kingston Mushkin OCZ Search Prices:

LOSTCIRCUITS	SHORTCUTS: A Process Shift Brisbane by Numbers Test Configurations Memory Subsystem Power Consumption 3D Rendering and Power per Renderpass POV-Ray- Cinebench AV-Encoding 3Dmark'06 F.E.A.R. DOOM3 FarCry L2 Cache Latencies The Plot Thickens Final Thoughts Give Us Some Feedback on this Review
AMD's Brisbane Core - the Transition to 65 nm And the cache latency
(Author: MS, January 5, 2007)

3D Rendering

POV-Ray v. 3.7

We were using the "all CPUs" benchmark that generates a score of the number of pixels rendered per second for all CPUs running in the system. Higher is better

Render Output

Pixels / sec: higher is better!

CineBench 2003

Multithreaded score: higher is better!

In both raytracing benchmarks, the differences between the 90 nm and the 65 nm parts are hardly noticeable - if they even exist.

next page: => AudioVisual Encoding =>