Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
The Missing Pin
The Numbers Game / Test Configurations
Latencies
Memory Bandwidty
Sysmark2004
Sysmark Continued
3ds max, Amorphium3
Cinebench3
Gaming Benchmarks
More Gaming Benchmarks
Overclocking, Conclusions

Give Us Some Feedback to Help Us Improve our Reviews

 AMD Athlon64 FX53
Back to the top
(Review by MS, July 1, 2004)
AMD Athlon64 3000+ At:

3D Rendering

3D rendering is one of the most time and CPU cycle-consuming applications imaginable. Redering times of 3-4 hours per frame for a photorealistic representation of any object are no exception, often times, rendering times exceed even days, depending on the complexity of the object, the resolution and the level of detail and effects. Needless to say that this genre of application is one of the few where cutting edge technology not only changes the annoyance factor but also results in direct increase in productivity and, by extension, monetary reward.


The most commonly employed program is Discreet's 3ds max formerly known as 3D Studio Max since it constitutes a reasonable compromise between price and performance. On the other end of the scale are programs like Caligari TrueSpace or ElectricImage's Amorphium, with the latter being one of the most intuitive entry-level 3D modeling and rendering programs out there. Historically, AMD CPUs have not done well in 3ds max, part of which, however onlyh reflects the choice of the model sujected to the rendering. In short, high vertex counts and complex geometry will favor the better floating point performance of the AMD processors whereas more textures including light effects will favor the P4.

   

C-Balls and Single Pipe

AMD Athlon64 3800+ At:

   

3dsmax Underwater Environment and Amorphium3

Whereas in the two top benchmarks the 3800+ takes the lead, at least within the field of AMD CPUs, it has to yield to the FX53 in the Unterwater Environment and the same is true for the Amorphium3 Benchmark.

next page:    => Cinebench 2003 =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits