Navigate: Advice Beginners BIOS Guide CPUs Links Mainboards Memory Network Storage Video/Sound Cards Contact Forum SiteMap Sponsors WebNews Home	.	.
Prices: Mainboards ABIT ASUS Chaintech Shuttle Soyo Tyan CPU Intel P4 2.4C-800 P4 2.6C-800 P4 2.8C-800 P4 3.0-800 P4 3.2-800 AMD AthlonXP XP 1700+ XP 2000+ XP 2400+ XP 2500+ XP 2700+ XP 3000+ XP 3200+ Athlon64 Athlon64 3200+ Athlon64 FX-51 Opteron Opteron 240 Opteron 242 Opteron 244 Opteron 246 Memory Corsair Crucial Kingston Mushkin OCZ Search Prices:

LOSTCIRCUITS	SHORTCUTS: The Missing Pin The Numbers Game / Test Configurations Latencies Memory Bandwidty Sysmark2004 Sysmark Continued 3ds max, Amorphium3 Cinebench3 Gaming Benchmarks More Gaming Benchmarks Overclocking, Conclusions Give Us Some Feedback to Help Us Improve our Reviews
AMD Athlon64 FX53 Back to the top
(Review by MS, July 1, 2004)

Cinebench 2003

Raytracing, OpenGL in software and hardware and C4D shading are the main benchmarks within the suite of Cinebench2003. The Raytracing benchmark makes extremely good use of Intel's HyperThreading and is, therefore dominated by all current P4 processors. Quite the opposite happens on the level of real-time rendering. In all three of the latter, the Athlon 64 3800+ takes the undisputed lead.

   

Raytracing and Maxxon Cinema4D

   

OpenGL Software T&L and Hardware T&L.

There is no doubt that the 3800+ captures the performance crown in all but the raytracing benchmarks.

next page:    => Gaming Performance =>