Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top Page
Test Configurations
Winstones
Sysmark2004
Cinebench2003
3ds max 5.1
3DMark2001SE
Aquamark3

Comanche4
FinalFantasy

Gunmetal
=>X2

Conclusions

Athlon64 3400+ Pricing

Give Us Some Feedback to Help Us Improve our Reviews

 AMD Athlon64 3400+
The speed bump that was more
(Review by MS, January 6, 2004)
AMD Athlon64 3000+ At:
GunMetal Benchmark1

Gunmetal is totally limited by the graphics card, whether it is a 1GHz or a 5 GHz CPU doesn't really matter; as long as none of the graphics settings are changed, all benchmarks will come out almost identical.


UnrealTournament 2003

There is np point in showing the flyby scenes since they are only graphics card limited. The Botmatch, on the other hand is limited by the CPU performance / system performance. And the winner is...

X2 Rolling Demo

X2 shows the same phenomenon we already saw in some other benchmarks, the Athlon64 is faster than the FX-51 at the same clock speed.

We ran a plethora of additional benchmarks from Quake3 Arena over Serious Sam and MDK2 and they all show basically the same thing, namely that the Athlon64 3400 is one hell of a fast processor which in most gaming applications actually outperformed the FX-51 on the nForce3-150 chipset. Again, with a different chipset for the FX-51, things might look better for the FX-family but a boost in frame rates in MDK2 from 389 to 417 fps for the FX-51 and the A64 3400+, respecively, at the same clock speed shows that the concept of dual channel memory may not be the one and only path to the performance paradise, rather, it appears as if low latencies are more important after all.

next page:    => Conclusion =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits