Navigate: Advice Beginners BIOS Guide CPUs Links Mainboards Memory Network Storage Video/Sound Cards Contact Forum SiteMap Sponsors WebNews Home	.	.
Prices: Mainboards ABIT ASUS Chaintech Shuttle Soyo Tyan CPU Intel P4 2.4C-800 P4 2.6C-800 P4 2.8C-800 P4 3.0-800 P4 3.2-800 AMD AthlonXP XP 1700+ XP 2000+ XP 2400+ XP 2500+ XP 2700+ XP 3000+ XP 3200+ Athlon64 Athlon64 3200+ Athlon64 FX-51 Opteron Opteron 240 Opteron 242 Opteron 244 Opteron 246 Memory Corsair Crucial Kingston Mushkin OCZ Search Prices:

LOSTCIRCUITS	SHORTCUTS: Top Page Test Configurations Test Configurations Overclocking Winstone Sysmark2004 3ds max Amorphium, Caligari Cinebench3 Gaming Benchmarks 64bit Performance, Conclusions Athlon64 3400+ Pricing Give Us Some Feedback to Help Us Improve our Reviews
AMD Athlon64 FX53 Back to the top
(Review by MS, March 18, 2004)

We have been using this version for a few years now and it has developed some patina, but the vase scene is still interesting enough, especially when it comes to looking at single vs. dual processor systems since the rendering is almost exclusively CPU dependent. The vase scene was run with Ray Tracing enabled and 4 x full scene anti aliasing to increase rendering time.

Runtime in seconds, lower is better.

In Caligari TrueSpace, the Athlon64 FX reclaims the top position after having been outperformed by the Extreme Edition. Exactly the same thing happens in Amorphium3, the FX51, once champion here had been defeated by Intel's two ExtremeEdition releases but the FX53 conquers the crown again. The light green bar is the score at 2604 MHz.

next page:    => Cinebench =>