Navigate: Advice Beginners BIOS Guide CPUs Links Mainboards Memory Network Storage Video/Sound Cards Contact Forum SiteMap Sponsors WebNews Home	.	.
Prices: Mainboards ABIT ASUS Chaintech Shuttle Soyo Tyan CPU Intel P4 2.4C-800 P4 2.6C-800 P4 2.8C-800 P4 3.0-800 P4 3.2-800 AMD AthlonXP XP 1700+ XP 2000+ XP 2400+ XP 2500+ XP 2700+ XP 3000+ XP 3200+ Athlon64 Athlon64 3200+ Athlon64 FX-51 Opteron Opteron 240 Opteron 242 Opteron 244 Opteron 246 Memory Corsair Crucial Kingston Mushkin OCZ Search Prices:

LOSTCIRCUITS	SHORTCUTS: Top Page Test Configurations Test Configurations Overclocking Winstone Sysmark2004 3ds max Amorphium, Caligari Cinebench3 Gaming Benchmarks 64bit Performance, Conclusions Athlon64 3400+ Pricing Give Us Some Feedback to Help Us Improve our Reviews
AMD Athlon64 FX53 Back to the top
(Review by MS, March 18, 2004)

Cinebench (Maxon) features four different benchmarks from CPU intensive raytracing over graphics card-heavy C4D shading and OpenGL in software and with Hardware T&L enabled.

   

   

The CPU intensive raytracing benchmark profits enormously from hyperthreading and pushes the Intel processors way ahead of anything the AMD competition can accomplish. However, in both C4D shading and OpenGL applications, the Athlon64 and especially the FX series are unbeatable. Again, the light-green bar is the FX53 at 2604 MHz. Note how the higher memory bandwidth favors the FX series. Overall, it is a solid green-top that we are looking at.

next page:    => Gaming =>