Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
The Speed Race
Numbers and Test Configurations
Synthetic CPU and Memory Benchmarks
WorldBench5
3dsmax
Lightwave [8], Cinebench 2003
CineBench 2003 cont.
OCR: Abbyy FineReader
Gaming Performance
Idle and BIOS Power
3D Rendering Power
DOOM3 Power
3Dmark'05 and Power
Prime95 and Final Thoughts

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 AMD Athlon64-FX57
The Cost of Speed
(Review by MS June 27, 2005)
AMD Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)

Power Consumption

The details of how we measured isolated CPU power are given in this article. We mentioned earlier that increasing clockspeed almost exponentially increases power consumption, at least on the Venice core and, further, that the larger cache of the San Diego core is estimated to add another 10% of baseline power. Therefore, we were curious about what would happen in practice as opposed to theory:

Windows Idle

Lower is better: Keep in mind that at those power levels, the systematic error based on limited granularity of the measuring equipment can skew the results. According to oour measurements, the FX57 core draws more power than the X2-4800+, at least in idle. On the other hand, the numbers we have closely match what we would expect on the basis of overclocking the Venice core.


Temperature Compensation

Power consumption in Watt: Lower is better. We monitored a "known constant" workload by entering the CMOS setup and checking the core temperature in the hardware monitor. As the temperature increases, the overall power consumption of the core goes up. The graph shows values for a number of current Socket 939 CPUs manufactured on either 130 or 90 nm process. Once again, the FX57 draws more power than the X2-4800+.

Athlon64 X2-4200+
(dual core)

next page: => 3D Rendering Power =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits