Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
The Multicore Conundrum
Another Turning Point
Specs and Numbers/ Testconfigurations
Benchmark Overview
SiSoft Sandra
Power Profiles
3D Rendering and Power
3dsmax, Lightwave
CineBench 2003
Gaming and Score/Watt
DOOM3, FarCry
ViewPerf
Final Thoughts

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 AMD Athlon64-FX60
At the Turning Point
(Review by MS January 10, 2006)
AMD Athlon64 X2-3800+ (Manchester)

Final Thoughts

There isn't really much to say, the FX60 has stolen the crown in almost every single benchmark we ran, and did so at power consumption levels that were partially below that of its own, lower clocked brethren. Officially, as we mentioned earlier, there is no change in silicon between the earlier revisions and the FX60. During some of the benchmarks, we thought we had seen some more dramatic increase in performance, however, retesting and retesting over and again showed that even a different driver revision for one or the other system component can easily fool us into wishful thinking, while at the end of the day, the carefully construed card house collapses under the burden of repetitive benchmark results. Which showed us that there are still no miracles in the AMD camp.

On the other hand, the FX60 does not need any miracles, it is fast enough as it is and essentially without competition in raw performance. If a performance per Watt metric is applied, naturally, single core CPUs are somewhat better since they don't carry the overhead of a second core under reduced load. On the other hand, even in that case, The FX60 has beaten all our expectations, running cool, quiet and at low power while delivering stellar performance. What else could we want? Well, there is this little problem with the price of US$ 1031,- at launch....

Athlon64 X2-4200+
(dual core)

next page: => More =>


All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!


General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits