Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
The Multicore Conundrum
Another Turning Point
Specs and Numbers/ Testconfigurations
Benchmark Overview
SiSoft Sandra
Power Profiles
3D Rendering and Power
3dsmax, Lightwave
CineBench 2003
Gaming and Score/Watt
DOOM3, FarCry
ViewPerf
Final Thoughts

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 AMD Athlon64-FX60
At the Turning Point
(Review by MS January 10, 2006)
AMD Athlon64 X2-3800+ (Manchester)

Software Configuration and Benchmark Results at One Glance

Software: 32-bit

Power Consumption Monitoring

We used the same power measurement setup as in our previous reports. Briefly, for isolated CPU power measurements, we used a Fluke 80i-410 AC/DC current probe in combination with a Wavetek Meterman 33XR multimeter to measure current through the isolated +12V supply lines feeding into the CPU VRM. To increase granularity of the measurements, we ran the supply lines in a triple loop through the clamp. The clamp itself was calibrated using a BK Precision model 1692, 30V 40 A DC power supply. Since there is a temperature dependency of the probe, we monitored the zero-current offset at the beginning of each measurement as well as at the end of each run. If the values drifted during we retook the measurements. Despite these precautions there are possible deviations of the read-out from the real current, however, these errors mostly affect the lower (processor idle) measurements. We estimate that the errors should not be more than 10% at the lower end of the data and less than 5% in the mid and higher data range. Moreover, since the same procedures were applied to all processors tested, there may be an offset in the absolute numbers, however, the relation of the individual cores to each other with respect to power consumption should be fairly accurate.

Bear in mind that the power measured is the input power going into the VRM rather than the regulated output power at the individual supply phases. However, the current VRMs are operating in the order of approximately 85-90% efficiency in the worst case. This means that the power measurements are slightly inflated across the board by approximately 10%.

Benchmark Results at One Glance

Athlon64 X2-4200+
(dual core)

next page: => SiSoft Sandra =>


All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!


General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits