Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:








































































































































What are you
shopping for?



































































































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Odd and Un-even numbers
X3 cores
Test Configurations
Memory Subsystem
Power Consumption
TrueSpace and Power Efficiency
Cinebench
MainConcept
DVD-Shrink, Nero Recode
VirtualDub/DivX
3DMark'06
World In Conflict
Crysis
F.E.A.R.
UnrealTournament3
The Final Analysis

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 AMD's Phenom X3 8750 - The Power of 3
(Author: Michael Schuette, April 27, 2008)

Memory Subsystem

We used SiSoft Sandra XII SP2 (earlier versions of Sandra crashed on the triple core) to get an idea whether there was any specific issue with the asymmetric distribution of cores across the memory controllers. Keep in mind, though that all cores are connected to each of the two memory controllers through the NB, using a crossbar configuration, in so far, at least in theory, there should not be a problem.

SiSoft Sandra XII SP2 Memory Bandwidth

The X3 8750 scores somewhat lower than the X4-9850. Part of this has to be attributed to the lower speed of the NorthBridge running at 1.8 GHz as opposed to 2 GHz on the 9850.

Cachemem 2.6.5

Memory access latencies, lower is better! The X3 8750 (transparent columns) compared to the X4 9850 (solid columns). The data are consistent with the memory bandwidth results obtained with SiSoft Sandra and show slightly higher access latencies for the X3 8750 compared to the X4 9850. Since all other system parameters were the same for both CPUs, the data point to the lower frequency of the NB as primary difference in hardware accountable for the perfornance delta.

next page: => Power Consumption =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits