Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:








































































































































What are you
shopping for?



































































































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Odd and Un-even numbers
X3 cores
Test Configurations
Memory Subsystem
Power Consumption
TrueSpace and Power Efficiency
Cinebench
MainConcept
DVD-Shrink, Nero Recode
VirtualDub/DivX
3DMark'06
World In Conflict
Crysis
F.E.A.R.
UnrealTournament3
The Final Analysis

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 AMD's Phenom X3 8750 - The Power of 3
(Author: Michael Schuette, April 27, 2008)

Power Consumption

Three cores should use less power than four but the power consumption of the Phenom series of CPU is a composite figure with the individual cores and the NB+L3 cache each contributing. Keep in mind that the split voltage plane provides AMD with a means to throttle the cores in frequency and voltage while keeping the NB+L3 cache running at full power. Realistically there is no way around this, since AMD's CPUs can throttle on a per core basis but that also requires that if any core is running under load, the memory controller and cache will have to do the same, regardless of what the other cores are doing at the same time.

Windows Idle Power

The X3 8750 draws 25.2 W, that is 16% less power than the X4 9850. Keep in mind that because of the idling, both CPUs are defaulting to 1/2 of their nominal clock speed, meaning that the X3 8750 is running about 50 MHz slower than the X4 9850. In addition, the NB is running at 1.8 GHz as opposed to 2 GHz on the x4 9850. Bottom line is that in idle, the power savings are marginal.

Max Power

Under full load, the reduction in core number bears fruit in terms of power savings, the delta of 30W almost directly scales with the disabling of one of the four cores, especially if the NB frequency and overall lower clock frequency are factored into the equation.

next page: => 3D Rendering / Energy Efficiency =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits