Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:








































































































































What are you
shopping for?



































































































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
A new Platform
Quad-FX Idiosyncrasies
The Motherboard
Test Config, Benchmark Overview
Memory Performance
The 64-bit Question
Idle Power by OS
Max Power
Render Power (Cinebench)
trueSpace
POV-Ray
Media Encoding
3DMark'06
F.E.A.R., DOOM3
FarCry 1.4
COD2, Prey
Final Words

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 AMD's Quad FX Platform
What's in a 4x4?
(Author: MS, January 21, 2007)

Test Configuration

"Quad FX" Platform:
  • ASUS L1N64 SLI,
  • AMD Athlon64 FX-74
  • 4 x 1 GB Corsair Dominator 1066 MHz modules
  • PC Power and Cooling Inc. Turbo Cool 1000 W PSU
"AM2" Platform:
  • ASUS M2R32 MVP, Sapphire PC-AM2RD580, Foxconn C51XEM2AA
  • AMD Athlon64 "ADO" 4800+ (G stepping, 65nm),**
  • AMD Athlon64 "ADO" 4600+ (F stepping, 90nm)**
  • AMD Athlon64 "ADD" 3800+ (F stepping, 90nm),
  • AMD Athlon64 "ADA" FX62 (F stepping, 90nm),
  • 2 x 1 GB OCZ PC2-6400 EL Dual Channel Platinum XTC modules
  • OCZ PowerStream 520ADJ
"Socket 939" Platform:
  • DFI LAN Party UT NF4 UltraD (Modded for SLI)
  • AMD Athlon64 FX60, X2 4800+, X2-3800+**
  • Athlon64 4000+, 3800+, 3500+
  • 2 x 512 MB OCZ PC3200 Platinum DDR modules
  • OCZ PowerStream 520ADJ
"975X" Platform:
  • Intel D975XBX2 mainboard
  • Intel "Conroe" Core 2 Extreme X6800, Core 2 Duo E6700,
  • Intel Pentium4 LGA 775 955 (Presler), 840 Extreme Edition, 840D, 820D
  • 2 x 1024 MB OCZ PC2 6400 DDR2 modules
  • OCZ PowerStream 520ADJ
2 x XFX n7900 GTX in SLI configuration; Forceware 93.71 driver***
2 x ASUS Xtreme n7800 GT in SLI configuration; Forceware 85.96 drivers (modified)
2 x ASUS Xtreme n7800 GT in SLI configuration; Forceware 85.96 drivers (modified)
2 x WD Raptor 150 GB (RAID Level 0)
1 WD Caviar 500 MB 7200 RPM SATA Drive
Maxtor Maxline3 250GB SATA HDD; Seagate Barracuda SATA V, Seagate SeaDisc 100GB USB
 :

** AMD uses the same model numbers for different revisions. To allow a better distinction between the processors shown, we use the * to flag the 65 nm G-stepping. In addition, we are labeling the 65 nm CPU running at 2.4 GHz with a memory frequency of 800 MHz as 4600* for a direct apples to apples comparison to the 4600+

*** For most benchmarks we used the system as supplied by AMD, that is, with the XFX GeForce 7900 GTX graphics cards in SLI configuration. For gaming benchmarks, we switched to the ASUS n7800 GT cards for the sake of comparabilty with our data base. In addition, we ran all gaming benchmarks again with the 7900 GTX cards to check for any impact on performance, which was non-existent at the resolutions used with the sole exception of Prey - which in the case of the 85.96 drivers does not recognize the application as SLI capable. Renaming the executable to "Qake4" enabled SLI also in Prey with the older drivers, however, due to time constraints, we did not re-run the benchmarks on all systems - therefore, we only show the results using non-SLI configured benchmark runs.

Benchmark Overview

We used the followig benchmarks:
  • SiSoft Sandra 2007

  • Cachemem 2.65

  • ScienceMark 2.0

  • CPU-Z

  • Caligari TrueSpace 5.1

  • POVRay

  • Cinebench 2003

  • 3DMark2006

  • Call of Duty2

  • DOOM3

  • FarCry

  • F.E.A.R.

  • MainConcept H.264

  • Dr. DivX OSS

  • DVD-Shrink 3.2

Power Measurements

Looking at system power consumption is interesting to a certain degree, however, for all practical purposes we are more interested in the isolated CPU power consumption. To estimate the latter, we used the same power measurement setup as in previous reports. Briefly, we used a Fluke 80i-410 AC/DC current probe in combination with a Wavetek Meterman 30XR multimeter to measure current through the isolated +12V supply lines feeding into the CPU VRM. To increase granularity of the measurements, we ran the supply lines in a triple loop through the clamp. The clamp itself was calibrated using a BK Precision model 1692, 30V 40 A DC power supply. Since there is a temperature dependency of the probe, we monitored the zero-current offset at the beginning of each measurement as well as at the end of each run. If the values drifted we retook the measurements. Despite these precautions there are possible deviations of the read-out from the real current, however, these errors mostly affect the lower (processor idle) measurements. We estimate that the errors should not be more than 10% at the lower end of the data and less than 5% in the mid and higher data range. Moreover, since the same procedures were applied to all processors tested, there may be an offset in the absolute numbers, however, the relation of the individual cores to each other with respect to power consumption should be fairly accurate. The extremely high power consumption of the CPU at full load causes a voltage droop by approximately 500 mV on the 12V output, the calculations are corrected accordingly.

In addition to the method outlined above, we used a modified PSU to run the 12V line directly through the Wavetek Meterman and read out the current. Both methods gave identical results.

next page: => Memory Performance =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits