Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
How many Hoover Dams?
Isolating Power
Dual Stress Liner
Venice Improvements
Test Conditions
Power/Temperature Coefficient
Idle vs. Burn-In
3D Rendering
3DMarks
DOOM3 and Prime95
Overclocking & Conclusions
Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 AMD Athlon64 "Venice"
May Low Power be with you!
(Review by MS May 2, 2005)
AMD Athlon 64 4000+

3D Rendering Power

Depending on the model used, 3D-rendering stresses mostly the floating point units for the geometry and the ALUs for texturing applications. In other words, complex geometry will hammer on the FPUs whereas materials and lighting add ALU load. We have used Adam Trachtenberg's "Vase" model for a number of years because it causes 100% CPU load, and Caligari trueSpace as the rendering software is multithreaded to take full advantage of physical and logical processors. The latter point does not matter for the task at hand, we are only interested in the power consumption during a complete rendering of the vases using 2 x AntiAliasing to add a bit more complexity and extend the runtime to about 5 minutes - time enough to reach a temperature saturation.


As a sanity check, we overclocked the Venice core to 2780 MHz, equivalent to a 16% overclock which, should result into a power draw delta somewhere in the area of 25 - 30% (estimated) In practice, we found that the power consumption went even higher to a measured 31% delta. The relatively poor resolution of our measuring equipment may have skewed this number slightly but it is certainly not impossible.

Initial power consumption at the begin of the rendering task. for Grins, we added the Venice core overclocked to 2780 MHz, that is a 380 MHz or 16% overclock. The power consumption (without changing the core voltage) increases by over 30% according to our measurements.

Power consumption towards the end of the rendering process is slightly higher to reflect an increase in core temperature.

Runtime in Seconds: lower is better. The Venice core at 2400 MHz is slightly faster than the rest of the pack. The differences are small but were repeatable over consecutive runs. Overclocked to 2780 MHz, the Venice core takes an undisputed lead.

Athlon64-3500+
(Venice Core)

next page: => Gaming Performance =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits