|
Advice Beginners BIOS Guide CPUs Links Mainboards Memory Network Storage Video/Sound Cards Contact Forum SiteMap Sponsors WebNews Home |
. | . |
Prices: Mainboards ABIT ASUS Chaintech Shuttle Soyo Tyan CPU Intel P4 2.4C-800 P4 2.6C-800 P4 2.8C-800 P4 3.0-800 P4 3.2-800 AMD AthlonXP XP 1700+ XP 2000+ XP 2400+ XP 2500+ XP 2700+ XP 3000+ XP 3200+ Athlon64 Athlon64 3200+ Athlon64 FX-51 Opteron Opteron 240 Opteron 242 Opteron 244 Opteron 246 Memory Corsair Crucial Kingston Mushkin OCZ |
LOSTCIRCUITS
|
|
| AMD Athlon64-X2-3800+ The Mancunian Candidate | |
|
(Review by MS September 20, 2005) |
| AMD Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice) |
Gaming Performance
The actual "gaming performance" metrics of 3DMark'05 is completely irrelevant as a CPU benchmark, rather we are using the CPU benchmark intergrated therein.
The X2 3800+ pretty much ties with the P4 670 and the 840D.
The Score / Watt metric on the other hand catapults the X2-3800 all the way to the top, challenged only by the Venice-based 3800+.
Once again, the Manchester core-based X2 3800+ appears to deliver the overall best compromise between performance and power consumption.
|
Athlon64 X2-3800+ (dual core) |
next page: => DOOM3, FarCry =>
All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!