Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top page
Specs
Test Platforms and Business WS2001
SiSoft Sandra
Content Creation Winstone 2002, Quake3 Arena
Comanche4, 3DMark2001SE
UnReal Tournament 2003
Caligari TrueSpace5.1, Overclocking, Conclusion
AMD Processor Steals

 AMD Athlon XP2800+   
The Truce of the AntiMatter
(Review by MS, October 1, 2002)
Content Creation Winstone 2002

Content Creation Winstone 2002 follows closely in the footsteps of Winstone 2001 and, unlike Content Creation Winstone 2001, it does not appear to be biased towards AMD processors, au contraire.... However, it does not seem to benefit as much from high IDE transfers as much as Business Winstone 2001 either.


CCWS2002 used to be a homerun for the P4, now, the Athlon XP2800 offers some serious paroli, regardless of the platform and HDD used. We would have liked to try the Barracuda SATA V on the nForce board but it would not correctly recognize it or if it did, crashed after a short time. Bottom line is that in content creation, memory bandwidth can make up for lack of IDE transfers. In view of these numbers, the fact that the P4 takes home the two top positions is almost unimportant. (V: VIA KT400 chipset, N: nForce2 chipset)

Gaming Benchmarks

Quake3 Arena

512 x 384 x 16 "Fastest"

The historical nemesis of AMD Processors has been Quake (II, 3) and things have not changed very much or maybe, they did now?

Quake3Arena Demo_four fps at the "Fastest" setting. The P4 overclocked to 3.15 GHz takes the lead, followed by (and that is quite a surprise) the XP2800 overclocked to 13.5 x 172 (2325) MHz (this was the highest frequency running stable on the A7N8X). Place 3 is taken by the P4 running at stock speed, closely followed by the XP2800 at default settings. Increasing the memory bus speed to 200 MHz (N-200) results in a dramatic performance loss and the VIA KT400-based A7V8X has to contend with the last place here.

640 x 480 x 16 "Normal"

Quake3Arena Demo_four fps "Normal". Nothing changes: The P4 overclocked to 3.15 GHz takes the lead, followed by (and that is no longer a surprise) the XP2800 overclocked to 13.5 x 172 (2325) MHz. The rest of the ranking does not change and neither does the performance hit caused by asyncronous memory operation go away.

next page:    => Comanche4, 3DMark2001SE =>

Click here! All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits