Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top page
Size Matters (for cache)
Specs and Test Platforms
Business Winstones
Content Creation Winstones
Games (Comanche4, UT2003)
SPEC ViewPerf, Overclocking
Conclusion, the Smoothness of The Cache
AMD Processor Steals

Flame the Author on the Forums

 AMD Athlon XP3000+   
Cache me if you can..
(Review by MS, Feb 10, 2003)
Performance

As mentioned in the beginning of this review, we only had since Saturday morning to run all the benchmark and write the review, so some of the benchmarks are showing more and some are showing fewer comparison systems which was all we could squeeze into the amount of time available. We deliberately skip synthetic benchmarks like SiSoft Sandra and PCMark since they really have no bearing on the performance metrics shown here.


ZD Labs Benchmarks

Business Winstone2001

According to some sources in some company this obsolete workload does not count. I guess it really depends on who is talking but the Athlons both show a very convincing performance even against Intel's heavyweight in form of the Granite Bay chipset.

The XP3000+ clearly pulls ahead of the XP2800+ despite a nominally lower clock speed. HyperThreading does not appear to make much difference here either, the scores on the Granite Bay-based ASUS P4G8X come out about even.

Business Winstone2002

The latest edition of Business Winstone with the suffic 2002 shows an even larger margin for the AMD processors. For my personal taste, the P4 - Granite Bay numbers are a bit on the low side but they were consistent within two runs. Increasing system memory to 1 GB changed the overall picture somewhat but that is not the topic of this review.

Again, the XP3000+ is ahead in the game followed by its little brother. HT enabling appears to hurt the P4 which is nothing new in this kind of application.

The entire picture is very reminiscent of the K6-2/III vs. PII/III situation where the AMD processors were unbeatable in business applications. But what about content creation and games?

next page:    => ContentCreation Winstone =>

Click here! All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits