Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top page
Size Matters (for cache)
Specs and Test Platforms
Business Winstones
Content Creation Winstones
Games (Comanche4, UT2003)
SPEC ViewPerf, Overclocking
Conclusion, the Smoothness of The Cache
AMD Processor Steals

Flame the Author on the Forums

 AMD Athlon XP3000+   
Cache me if you can..
(Review by MS, Feb 10, 2003)
Conclusion

Benchmarks are benchmarks and they need to be respected for what they are but nothing really captures the responsiveness and agility of the Barton system that is the reincarnation of what we used as comparison between the K6-III and the PII more than a few years ago. We then used the comparison between a high powered SUV (PII) vs. a two-stroke powered motorbike. They both are fast and there are instances where the P4 is definitely superior. But guess, which one is more fun?


The Athlon XP3000+ is not a cheap processor, in fact, at its debut it will run almost $600 in quanities of 1K. On the other hand, it turned out more powerful than we had expected or dreamed or even thought it would be possible to achieve with just an increase in cache size. Well, that is not really true, we did expect the performance increase that we found but it is nice to see it happen anyway.

As stated just above, every system feels different and the the performance difference between the Thoroughbred and the Barton core are not something that can be documented very easily in form of benchmarks. This is, in many ways, where the Business Winstones still have some value, despite the obvious question of "Who needs that anyway" because it is one of the benchmarks that capture the responsiveness of the system.

We could ramble on but I feel that there is really no need. From the benchmarks that we have run, it appears that it will take a GraniteBay system to beat the XP3000+ in the majority of applications, however, we also need to take into account that by the end of the day, there is no price difference left either. Then it comes down to a matter of taste again.

next page:    => more =>

Click here! All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits