Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Encoding and Ripping, a New Market
The Tools: Nero to DivX
Multithreading and Parallel Processing
Test Setup
Performance
Final Thoughts

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 Video and Audio Encoding Performance
AMD's Dual Core vs, Intel's Core2 Duo
(Review by JoeF, August 28, 2006)

One Lump or Two?

All the programs used, with the exception of LAME, claim support for multithreading to take advantage of dual core processors or multi-core systems. There is a multithreaded version of LAME available, but it requires a feature of LAME to be disabled, which could potentially result in a lower-quality MP3 file.

Monitoring the CPU utilization in Monkey’s Audio showed that it only hit 50%, indicating that Monkey’s Audio was not using the second core on the CPU. Digging through the options revealed the capability of Monkey’s Audio to simultaneously encode more than one file. By making a second copy of the source .wav file and loading them both into Monkey’s Audio, it was possible to peg the CPU utilization at 100%, using all the power available. Monkey’s Audio was tested both with a single file in queue and with two files encoding at the same time.

CPU Utilization in Monkey's Audio towards the end of simultaneous encoding of four .wav files. The last file took longer and while its encoding still continued, the CPU utilization dropped to 50% before tapering off after all encoding ws finished.

Dr. DivX OSS was able to get the CPU utilization between 60% and 80%, showing that it was using both CPU cores, but not to their fullest capability. Nero Vision, however, kept the dual core CPU utilization above 90%, making a good showing for Nero’s built-in MPEG2 encoder.

The BIOS of the Intel 975 board used for the Core 2 processors allows the chip to be run as either a dual core or single core CPU. On the Intel side a comparison is something of a moot point, since all currently announced Core 2 CPUs are dual core. AMD is still offering single core chips for both S939 and AM2, though the only processors here for evaluation are of the dual-core variety. Unfortunately, the single core option does not appear in the BIOS of AMD boards. What is left to us is to do the single/dual core comparison on the Intel chips and extrapolate the results. We’ll see exactly how much of a difference the second core makes.

Athlon64 X2-3800+
(ADA3800DAA5CD)
Core2 Duo E6300
(HH80557PH0362M)

next page: => The Secret of the Cache =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits