Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Integrated Graphics
AMD's 690G / Radeon 1250 Platform
Intel G965 / GMA X3000 Platform
Test Environment / Pricing
DVD Performance
Gaming: F.E.A.R.
Gaming: S.T.A.L.K.E.R.
3DMark '06
Vista Performance Index
Vista DVD and DRM
Storage Subsystem
Final Words

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 AMD' 690G vs Intel's 965G
Revolte of the Integrated Graphics
(Joe Freund, September 4, 2007)

Final Words

Current pricing from a major internet vendor places the M2A-VM HDMI + X2 5600+ combo at $225, while the P5B-VM + E6420 pairing weighs in at $296. With the stock coolers on both processors, noise was negligible and CPU temps were never a concern. What did get hot were the chipset heatsinks on both motherboards. The stock chipset heatsinks on both boards do not conform to the standards seen on most full-sized motherboards, so replacement cooling is not easy to accomplish. Neither system exhibited stability problems (even during overnight loops of 3DMark), but adequate case ventilation is definitely recommended.

Each chipset shows the lineage of its integrated graphics. AMD’s solution is clearly a scaled-down version of their dedicated graphics chips, while Intel’s offering starts from a point of minimum functionality and adds features from there. Both are completely sufficient for a standard office PC or for Grandma’s email system, even if Windows Vista is involved. When more demanding tasks are attempted, however, AMD’s 690G more than edges out the Intel G965. Neither comes close to what a discrete video card could achieve, but a casual gamer on a tight budget or an HTPC user could get by with the 690G at least until the funds for a better card are available. The 3D and video acceleration features of the Intel G965 feel more like a marketing afterthought.

Ed. Note

Survival does not always depend on who wins the most benchmarks in the high end sector, where Intel is the undisputed leader at this point. The bread and butter systems that are making the largest volume in the desktop sector are the fiduciary high-lights, they are the ones that are paying the bills and that are keeping the lights on. Arguably, AMD is currently in rather troubled waters but things can change in a heartbeat regardless of how much value is assigned to the resignation of Dave Orton and Rick Hegberg. At least in the budget sector, AMD systems have a lot to offer and that can be used to buy time until the next performance surprise is ready to be released. How much time? Nothing lasts forever, the pressure is on and the next few months will be a turning point, one way or the other.

next page: => More =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits