Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
PCI Express for Graphics
Test Platforms
Sysmark2004 Overview
Sysmark2004 Take 2
3D Rendering
Cinebench 2003
Gaming Performnance
The Final Analysis
Give Us Some Feedback to Help Us Improve our Reviews

 Intel LGA775 SocketT Part 2
System Performance
(Review by MS, August 16, 2004)
OCZ PC3200 DUAL-CHANNEL EL DDR 512MB(256X2)
400MHz DDR CAS2 - PLATINUM

Conclusions

In this second installment of the Intel 925 platform we have looked at a variety of real life applications and surprisingly, the newbie platform took most of the benchmarks in a tour de force. One aspect worth mentioning here is that the data were obtained without the aid of native command queuing since everything was run on the very same hard disk, that is, the Maxtor Diamond Max Plus9 SATA 150 which does not support NCQ.


Of course, this opens the same old question that has plagued the review community over and again, namely, which one is valid, running everything on the same hardware or else using the stuff that works best with each platform. The latter is probably the more accurate way to do justice to any given product but on the other hand, there is just too much way for interpretation in that case to be practical.

Back to the current results. Gaming applications were the only soft point in the new platform and at this point it is not clear whether this is an issue with DDR2 or with PCI express. Suffice it to say that the weight in all gaming benchmarks was primarily on the system rather than on the graphics card, especially in Unreal Tournament Botmatch and Comanche4 and, therefore the bottleneck appears to be more on the CPU and memory side. We are still far from a definite answer, though.

With respect to the other applications, we also have to consider that the 3.6 GHz Prescott CPU is the fastest P4 processor currently announced, even though it is not available in the channel. In other words, some of the numbers that we were looking at are a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy since there is no equivalent Socket 478 CPU. On the other hand, the benchmark results are there and, paper-launch or not, the P4 3.6E is overall probably the fastest CPU out there.

On a clock for clock comparison, the situation is somewhat different. In order to shed a bit more light on the results, we took the Extreme Edition scores for both the 875 and the 925 platforms and plotted the difference in performance for all applications we looked at. The difference is plotted in absolute values, that is, e.g. 0.02 means a 2% difference and so on. To make it easier, we colored the cases where the 925 was slower than the 875 in red, vice versa, when the 925 was faster, the delta is shown in blue.

     

     

Leaving out the clock advantage, the tables are turning and the 875 platform looks quite a bit more appealing. Bottomline here appears the fact that DDR2 seems ok for office tasks but the new platform has some real weaknesses in gaming applications and in this case we are not even talking about the overall positioning compared to AMD but only a clock for clock face-off.

P4 2.4E (Prescott) At:

Surprisingly, in most applications we looked at, there was hardly any impact of latencies on the performance of the system. Does that mean that all of a sudden latencies don’t matter anymore? Quite honestly, this does not seem to be true, however, Intel has succeeded to cover latencies through a very sophisticated prefetch system integrated in the 925 chipset. A different way to look at things is of course to say that the IPC of the processor is so low that latencies won’t matter. It is all a question of the viewing angle but the performance of the new platform speaks for itself.

As mentioned, we have not covered the probably most important aspect of the new platform yet, which is the ICH6 with its native command queuing capabilities. We will have an in-depth coverage of the impact of NCQ shortly, though.

next page:      => More =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits