|
Advice Beginners BIOS Guide CPUs Links Mainboards Memory Network Storage Video/Sound Cards Contact Forum SiteMap Sponsors WebNews Home |
. | . |
Prices: Mainboards ABIT ASUS Chaintech Shuttle Soyo Tyan CPU Intel P4 2.4C-800 P4 2.6C-800 P4 2.8C-800 P4 3.0-800 P4 3.2-800 AMD AthlonXP XP 1700+ XP 2000+ XP 2400+ XP 2500+ XP 2700+ XP 3000+ XP 3200+ Athlon64 Athlon64 3200+ Athlon64 FX-51 Opteron Opteron 240 Opteron 242 Opteron 244 Opteron 246 Memory Corsair Crucial Kingston Mushkin OCZ |
LOSTCIRCUITS
|
|
| Intel's V8-Demo System "Octopussy" | |
|
(Review by MS, May 31, 2007) |
CPU Power Consumption
One of our main focuses when looking at processors has been to isolate the CPU power from the rest of the system and look at the various aspects of power efficiency. That is, in addition to looking at Windows idle power which is a huge cost component in any environment where computers are running, we have been looking at full load power consumption along with application specific power consumption per task. A case in point was the power consumption per render pass in Caligari TrueSpace as shown on the last page. However, it is certainly also of interest to look at other aspects of power consumption as idle and full loadif for nothing else than to gauge the requirements for a power supply unit.
Windows Idle
Power consumption, lower is better
Max Load
Power consumption, lower is better
Overall, despite running on eight cores and displaying record-breaking performance, the power demands of the "Octopus" processors are well within the limits of what is tolerable. Arguably, performance has its price, and that includes power but regardless of whether it is Windows idle power or else full load, we have seen a lot worse in the past.
![]() (BX80557E6300) |
next page: => Final Thoughts =>
All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!