Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home

Xoxide Computer Mods
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
A matter of 8 cores
Dual Independent Buses
FBDIMMs or back to the MTH
FBDIMMs, Take 2
The S5000XVN
Test Configuration
Memory Bandwidth
Latencies
Intercore and cache communication
DVD Shrink, & Mainconcept H.264
Futuremarks
Cinebench, POV Ray
TrueSpace and Render Power
Power Consumption
Final Thoughts

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 Intel's V8-Demo System
"Octopussy"
(Review by MS, May 31, 2007)

Memory Subsystem

Because of the FBDIMM architecture, we'll spend a bit more effort on the memory subsystem. As mentioned on the last page, conventional benchmarks such as SiSoft Sandra may not take full advantage of the FBDIMM system, on the other hand, as also mentioned earlier, the entire argumentation about FBDIMMs providing 1.5x the bandwidth of a standard memory system because of the "dual ported" nature of the bus interface is a moot point since at the end, there are still standard memory chips that are not capable of concurrent reads and writes.

Unfortunately, Cachemem does not run on Vista-64 either, therefore, we have to rely on SiSoft Sandra's latency tool for the latency measurements as well.

Buffered Memory Bandwidth

Memory Bandwidth [MB/sec], higher is better

Unbuffered Memory Bandwidth

Memory Bandwidth [MB/sec], higher is better

Interestingly, turning on "buffering and prefetching" in Sandra results in a performance hit, that is, the unbuffered benchmark results are better than those with buffering enabled. Keep in mind though that the AMB and the chipset, let alone the dual independent host bus architecture abide by slightly different rules than what we see in conventional x86 systems.

Memory Bandwidth [MB/sec], higher is better

In comparison to other systems, particularly the ccNUMA enabled Quad FX system, the FBDIMM architecture looks somewhat poor with the unbuffered (UB) results being markedly better than the buffered transfers. However, we cannot stress the point enough that we are not running SPEC, UA or ART benchmarks that, even tough synthetic as well, may yield totally different results (average of three runs each).


(BX80557E6300)

next page: => Latencies =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits