Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home

Xoxide Computer Mods
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Core 2 Duo: The light at the end of the tunnel
Core 2 Key Features
Specs and Numbers/ Testconfigurations
Benchmark Overview
Memory Performance 1
Memory Latencies
Power Plays
TrueSpace5.1 and Rendering Power
3dsmax 8.0
Cinebench 2003
3DMark'05
FarCry, F.E.A.R.
Call of Duty, DOOM3, Prey
Final Thoughts

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 Intel Core 2 Duo
Blinded by the light
(Review by MS, July 25, 2006)

Final Thoughts

At its introduction, each generation of CPU generates a huge splash, the one notable exception was - and that may be a personal preference - the Pentium4 that caused lots of discussions and speculations about the technical merits of the branch prediction units along with a lot of other hot wind but in the end turned out to be a power-hungry, hot piece of silicon and not much else.

Where AMD had one big triumph with the K7 and then later with the K8, such a thing was missing from Intel's processor launches that, coincidentally, happened mostly on days when everybody else was having a lot of fun watching Superbowl events.

The Core 2 Duo dual core processor launch finally puts the word fun back into the release of a new architecture and that appears to be what Intel needed more than anything else. In terms of performance, the Core 2 processors swept every single benchmark with the exception of the OpenGL Hardware Rendering task of Cinebench 2003 -which arguably taxes the memory system more than the CPU - and even there, we might be looking at some freak accident rather than a representative result for the E6700.

I mentioned it already in the benchmark section but if there was one single graph that shows the difference between Intel yesterday and Intel today, that graph would be the score/W graph of the CPU benchmark in 3DMark 2005. We are not talking about 10% improvement, not 20% or even 50% either but rather a whopping 560% increase in processor efficiency - compared to the worst contender in the mix, namely the Smithfield family with the D820 and EE840 being representatives. The worst part of this is that we can't even say that these processors were bad but, compared to the new lineup, they are just completely below par.

At this point, it goes without saying that Intel has regained the crown in the desktop processor segment, AMD is still not out of the picture but it is clear that there is a need for a new design. It won't be the K9, that's almost certain but rumor has it that the K10 is not that far out.

Is the Core 2 Duo worth throwing away the existing system? That is one of the questions that we were trying to answer by keeping some of the older, "obsolete" system configurations in the listing, most of which will still work perfectly fine, especially in gaming situations where the graphics cards are more important than anything else. With respect to semiconductors, silicone sisters aside, the Core 2 Duo is definitely where the fun is - cause she was blinded by the light…at the end of the tunnel

Intel Core Duo T2600
(dual core)

next page: => More =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits