Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
SMP and the New Intel
Kentsfield Key Features
Power Management and Cache Questions
Test Setup, Benchmark Overview
Power Consumption
Memory System
3D Rendering: TrueSpace
POV-Ray 3.7
Cinebench 2003
DVD Shrink, Dr DivX & Mainconcept H.264
Futuremarks
FarCry, DOOM3
F.E.A.R.
Prey, Call of Duty2
Final Thoughts

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 Intel's Core 2 Quad Extreme Edition QX6700
Codename "Kentsfield"
(Review by MS, November 1, 2006)

Final Thoughts

The release of a quad core CPU, even in a die-pairing design, increases Intel's performance lead in the desktop space beyond that of the Core2 Duo / Extreme family. Currently, the Quad version is only available as Extreme Edition, which is a bit pricey after all but there will be lower clock speed versions available at a reduced price point in the near future. The Core2 Duo or "Conroe" series will - at least in the foreseeable future - co-exist with the "Kentsfield" design, which is a good thing for those still shooting for an upgrade to the first - it will not be obsolete!

Overall, the Kentsfield processor has swept the entire benchmark suite except for gaming. If gaming is the primary concern, then there is no doubt that any Conroe or else, any AMD processors will probably deliver the same bang for a lot less buck, and this is just a practical and budgetary consideration.

Another issue is the question of CrossFire vs. SLI in this regard. We were running all benchmarks in SLI configuration, regardless of the platform (with the exception of the dual CPU Opteron platform with its single PCIe x16 slot) but the hacked drivers that enable SLI are not readily available (yet). This puts SLI fans into a certain bind, either go with the nForce 590 for Intel series or else take a gamble that a given application will be buggy on a non-supported platform - or else, change their mind and go with ATI until nVidia releases unlocked drivers. That's a tough one.

The 3D rendering community on the other hand, along with the media encoders have any reason to drool over the Quad core processor. Depending on the application, the Kentsfield is just wicked fast and those are the type of application where real time savings are achievable.

We would have liked to include applications like SolidWorks or ProEngineer into the benchmarks unfortunately, aside from the OpenGL suites made available by SPEC.org, there is nothing out there in terms of free downloads and those applications - as we showed not long ago are essentially single-threaded and, therefore not suitable for benchmarking a quad core CPU. Not to mention the abomination of running ViewPerf on a consumer or gaming graphics card.

One thing we were concerned about was the power consumption of the Kentsfield, however, our worries were essentially dissipated. In idle, Intel's power management puts the Kentsfield at about 20% over the equivalent Core2 Duo and that is in the noise when it comes to system power consumption. Arguably, we won't see the Extreme Edition in a cell phone or PDA (yet) but compared to the P4 monstrosities, the Kentsfield - just like Conroe - is environmentally correct and fits right into the current landscape of energy-aware computing. The same goes for heat dissipation in view of the greenhouse effect. Overall, there is no way of denying Intel one of our coveted Exceptional Hardware Awards!

Digg this story


(BX80557E6300)

next page: => more =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits