Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
SMP and the New Intel
Kentsfield Key Features
Power Management and Cache Questions
Test Setup, Benchmark Overview
Power Consumption
Memory System
3D Rendering: TrueSpace
POV-Ray 3.7
Cinebench 2003
DVD Shrink, Dr DivX & Mainconcept H.264
Futuremarks
FarCry, DOOM3
F.E.A.R.
Prey, Call of Duty2
Final Thoughts

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 Intel's Core 2 Quad Extreme Edition QX6700
Codename "Kentsfield"
(Review by MS, November 1, 2006)

Memory Performance

Raw memory bandwidth has not been the strongest point of the latest Intel chipsets and processors. Where the P4 ExtremeEdition 3.73 scored an impressive 7.1 GB/sec bandwidth using prefetch and buffering in SiSoft Sandra, no subsequent Intel Netburst processor got even close to this number and the Core2 family did not improve in this respect either. On the other hand, it is not scrolling through the pages that counts, on the contrary, memory disambiguation in combination with overlapping commands a.k.a. Intel Fast Memory Access is the secret weapon that - unfortunately - escapes the metrics of essentially all current memory bandwidth benchmarks. It is, therefore, not surprising that the QX6700 does not shine in Sandra.

SiSoft Sandra Buffered Memory Bandwidth

Memory bandwidth: higher is better

Memory and Cache Access Latencies

Memory access latencies: lower is better. We compared the Core2 Duo E6700 (dark edges) with the Core 2 Quad QX6700 (white edges). The single die version is slightly faster across the bench. Note that the cache size for both CPUs comes out the same, despite the 8MB spec, 8 MB blocks cannot be cached. As mentioned, the reason is that the 8MB total L2 cache refers to two independent and separate "non-shared" blocks of 4 MB cache per die that are only communicating via the system bus.


(BX80557E6300)

next page: => 3D Rendering Performance =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits