Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home

Xoxide Computer Mods
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top page
Cache and Die Size
TDP and Form Factor
Specs and Test Setup
Sandra, Cachemem
Winstones
MadOnions and Futuremarks
UT2003, Comanche4, X2
Gunmetal, Aquamark
FinalFantasy, MDK2

SPEC ViewPerf
3dsmax
Cinebench
TrueSpace, Amorphium, Flask
Conclusion

Get a 2.4C and OC the hell out of it!

Please give us some feedback

 Intel P4 Extreme Edition   
Cache Size Matters
(Review by MS, October 11, 2003)
The Cache Size - Die Size Confusion

The total die size of the Extreme Edition core has been a matter of confusion, amongst the reasons were the fact that different processors, even if they are manufactured on a similar process (e.g. 130 nm), will not scale 1:1 with respect to transistor count and die size. For example, the addition of 256 KB from the Thoroughbred to the Barton core resulted in 21 mm2 die size increase from 80mm2 to 101mm2. The transition from the Barton to the Athlon64 cannot be directly scaled with respect to cache versus die size since the integrated memory controller and the additional general purpose and MMX registers need to be taken into account as well, along with the HyperTransport interfaces. On the other hand, according to our own measurements, the 1 MB L2 cache of the different flavors of the Athlon64 occupies approximately 82 mm2 and, therefore, does scale quite well with the Barton cache size - 4 x 21 mm2 would be 84 mm2.


In the case of the Northwood core, each 256 kB block of the L2 cache takes up only 8 mm2. In other words, the cell- or bit density is approximately 2.5 x that of the AMD processors, which reflects the fact that Intel has the probably best SRAM density in the industry. If we factor this differential in memory density into any projection of the final die size of the P4 EE, that is, we take the 146 mm2 die size and add eight times 8 mm2 (8 x 256 kB = 2 MB) plus approximately 25 % overhead for the interconnect, additional, required I/O logic and interfacing, we end up with a die size of roughly 230mm2. Since a 100% utilization of real estate would end up as an extremely convoluted floor plan, there are a few empty spots on the die that can be used for additional ground planes and in so far the official die size of 237 mm2 is exactly where it should be expected.

It is actually interesting to see where the SRAM density is going at Intel. With the current 130 nm interconnect process, we are still looking at roughly 5 µm2 per SRAM cell or bit. With the upcoming 90 nm technology, the cells will shrink to a little over 1.5 µm2 per bit. As we have learned, Intel has already produced 52 Mbit SRAM arrays, including all additional logic and I/O functionality, which, in accordance with our numbers about a roughly 25% overhead, results in approximately 330 million transistors on as little as 109 mm2. This means that in the next generation of CPU, we may see as much as 6 MB L3 cache including ECC functionality on the same 100 mm2 footprint.

Electron Micrograph of a 6T-SRAM cell manufactured using a 90 nm process, picture courtesy of Intel.

next page:    => TDP and Form Factor =>

Click here! All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits