Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top Page
Test Configuration
Benchmark Overview

RC5, CPUMark
SiSoft Sandra

3DMark2000
FinalReality 1.01

Expendable, Quake2
Quake3 Arena

Conclusions

Buy the ASUS K8V

 AMD K6-III+ and K6-2+
Shaptooth's Final Bite
(Review by Aaron Vienot, July 13, 2001)
AMD Athlon64 3200+ At:
Synthetic Benchmarks

RC5

RC5 is an ALU-intensive program, released by Distributed.net as a client for the RSA Labs 64-bit decryption project.


The K6-III+ gets only a slight advantage from its on-die L2 cache. This is not surprising, since RC5 uses hardly any memory transfer. Hence the majority of program instructions and in-progress key packets would be expected to fit into the 64kB L1 cache common to both processors.

CPUMark 99

This Ziff-Davis offering performs synthetic tests and returns a 'rating'. The meaning of the score may be questionable in a cross-platform evaluation, but in our situation makes for a nice comparison:

Something in CPUMark likes the addition of the on-die L2 cache, as the per-clock scores increased as much as 44.9%. Interesting is that the K6-2 scores are bus speed dependent whereas the K6-III+ scores show no such behavior. This suggests that CPUMark is cache-intensive.

Sandra 2001se

To demonstrate the theoretical memory bandwidth improvement the Tri-level cache architecture offers in the K6-III+ as compared to the K6-2, I used SiSoft Sandra Memory benchmark:

The K6-III+ holds a near-constant 21% bandwidth lead over the K6-2 in ALU and about 13% in FPU. Interestingly, for the K6-2 its FPU-memory bandwidth runs roughly a 14% lead over that of its own ALU at every clock, while the K6-III+ narrows the gap to just 6%. Note that the scores only depend on bus speed whereas internal CPU clock speed does not make any difference

next page:    => 3DMark2000, FinalReality 1.01 =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits