Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home

Xoxide Computer Mods
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Energy-Efficiency
CPU vs. System Power
CPU Specs and Numbers
Test Setup, Benchmark Overview
Idle Power, Prime95
3D Rendering Power
Cinebench 2003
Memory Subsystem
Access Latencies
3DMark '05 and Gaming Power
FarCry, Call of Duty2
F.E.A.R., Prey
DOOM3
Final Thoughts

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 Low Power and Energy-Efficient CPUs from Intel and AMD
Core2 Duo E6300 vs. X2-3800+ (ADD) and X2-4600+ (ADO)
(Review by MS, August 20, 2006)

Summary

With the release of the Core2 Duo line of CPU, Intel has made a complete turn-around in their line-up, pushing the new party line of instructions per Watt. At first glance, primarily the lower speed grades are target for energy-efficiency claims for the simple reason that power consumption increases with frequency in a linear fashion. At close-up, the situation is quite a bit different since Intel's Enhanced Speedstep Technology throttles the frequency of the higher grades back to the same base frequency of 100 MHz while simultaneously lowering the supply voltage, thereby mitigating any potential savings of the lower speedgrades under idle conditions.

From AMD's camp, we see a new line of Energy-Efficient processors being released with target power consumption of 35W (code: ADD) and 65W (code: ADO), respectively. We lined up one of each class, including Intel's Core2 Duo E6300 to put them trough the paces of both performance and power measurements. At the end of the day, there is one clear winner in this roundup which surpassed our wildest expectations - guess which one ....

Turmoil in CPU-World

The CPU-World is currently in a total turmoil. The slow slide of Intel’s market share into the hands of AMD was completely usurped by the recent introduction of the Merom core-based Core2 Duo architecture, offering blazing performance at price points that put to shame anything available hitherto. While the pain is primarily felt by AMD, it also poses the question of what to do with the remaining inventory Netburst - a.k.a. P4 processors - that, in comparison to the new line-up can be considered great for keychains or an interesting bathroom wall tiling mosaic.

AMD A64 X2 3800+

Of course, tiling and modern art jewellery as suggested use for the remaining P4 inventory are an exaggeration, even this processor had its merits at one point in history. Still, the fact remains that the new buzz is power efficiency or instructions per [W]. Interestingly, the low-power initiative includes new models also from AMD, specifically, there are the new X2-3800+ ADD and the X2-4600+ ADO, both based on the Windsor core in its half-cache variety. The two processors are rated as 35W or 65W, respectively, max thermal design power (TDP). Keep in mind that the TDP numbers not necessarily reflect the actual power consumption of the processor but rather the requirements that a mainboard manufacturer needs to meet in order to get qualified for the use of a specific CPU. This necessarily includes a more or less significant overhead taking into account forward-looking power projections and overclocking situations.

AMD A64 X2 4600+

In the Intel camp, the lower Core2 Duo models are also claimed to be musters in energy efficiency. Particularly the half-cache versions in the form of E6300 and E6400 are predestined to be used in fan-less designs or passively-cooled systems.

Intel Core2 Duo E6300

The above mentioned term “Passive Cooling” is one of the major buzzwords in this respect but it is also one of the worst examples of verbal abuse in the field of technology parlance. Just to straighten out a few definitions here: Passive cooling in the true sense of the word is limited to heat exchange with the environment based exclusively on convection or emission but does not include the use of forced air movement – regardless of whether it is a dedicated fan or any auxiliary fan-induced (PSU, case fan) air flow. To further clarify the terminology mentioned: convection is the movement of any heat-absorbing material based on thermally-induced buoyancy – the effect that heating up most materials will expand them and, thereby, reduce their specific gravity, forcing them to rise relative to their environment.

Athlon64 X2-3800+
(ADA3800DAA5CD)
Core2 Duo E6300
(HH80557PH0362M)

next page: => CPUs, a small part in the system power equation =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits