|
Advice Beginners BIOS Guide CPUs Links Mainboards Memory Network Storage Video/Sound Cards Contact Forum SiteMap Sponsors WebNews Home 
|
. | . |
Prices: Mainboards ABIT ASUS Chaintech Shuttle Soyo Tyan CPU Intel P4 2.4C-800 P4 2.6C-800 P4 2.8C-800 P4 3.0-800 P4 3.2-800 AMD AthlonXP XP 1700+ XP 2000+ XP 2400+ XP 2500+ XP 2700+ XP 3000+ XP 3200+ Athlon64 Athlon64 3200+ Athlon64 FX-51 Opteron Opteron 240 Opteron 242 Opteron 244 Opteron 246 Memory Corsair Crucial Kingston Mushkin OCZ |
LOSTCIRCUITS
|
|
| Low Power and Energy-Efficient CPUs from Intel and AMD Core2 Duo E6300 vs. X2-3800+ (ADD) and X2-4600+ (ADO) | |
|
(Review by MS, August 20, 2006) |
Cinebench 2003
We used the multithreaded rayracing as well as the OpenGL hardware rendering, the latter is interesting with respect to the CPU-memory subsystem. Higher scores are better.
The multithreaded rendering scales exclusively as a factor of clock speed and without any impact of the cache on performance.
If we take the runtime in second and multiply it by the power draw measured throughout the render pass, we get the total power per render pass:
The OpenGL benchmark results had some variation between results for all processors, it appears as if there is some randomness in those numbers. For example, in our initial testing, the E6700 repeatedly performed much worse than when we retested - in other words, it may be time to exclude this particular benchmark from further articles.
|
Athlon64 X2-3800+ (ADA3800DAA5CD) | |
|
Core2 Duo E6300 (HH80557PH0362M) |
next page: => Memory Subsystem =>
All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!