Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Brief Overview
The Northwood Core
Benchmark Overview
Test Configurations
SiSoft Sandra
Office Productivity
Expendable, 3DMark2001
Quake3 Arena
Aquamark, TrueSpace PubBench
TrueSpace Ray Tracing, Video Editing
XP Performnance
Conclusion
 Shootout above 2 GHz    
Northwood vs. Willamette vs. Athlon XP
(Review by MS, January 7, 2002)
The Benchmark Dilemma

Benchmarks are like sex, everybody loves doing it, everybody thinks they are good at it, and nobody really understands that hormones take over where the brain used to be. The truth is that with benchmarks, anything can be shown, if necessary, I could probably make my own main system (socket7) look better than most high end test candidates. Over the past months, we have been working with out own suite of benchmarks here comprising those applications that not only are widely distributed but also have the highest consumer ratings and further, are actually relevant for the consumer. Since this review's scope goes beyond the system capabilities and straight down to the CPU level, we are adding some synthetic benchmarks just to provide a rounded picture and to catch some minor differences since the granularity of synthetic benchmarks is often better than what we see in real life applications. Conversely, we can also say, for real life, who cares?


In detail, we were using the following benchmarks:

Synthetic Benchmarks

Semi-synthetic Benchmarks Gaming Applications Professional CAD Applications Video Editing

All benchmarks were run in Windows98 SE and WindowsXP as long as they were appliccable. That is, ZDNet-Labs Content Creation Winstone 2001 does not run int WinXP, likewise, Sysmark2000 showed totally erratic behavior in WinXP so that we abstain from showing any results. For some reason, the Caligari TS4.2 benchmark would immediately crash in WinXP while running flawlessly in Win98SE. Some applications gave largely different results depending on the operating system which is why we show both sets of data where necessary. In general, WinXP gave higher scores in some applications but there are quite a few exceptions.

next page:    => Test Configuration =>

Click here! All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits