Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home

Xoxide Computer Mods
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Brief Overview
The Northwood Core
Benchmark Overview
Test Configurations
SiSoft Sandra
Office Productivity
Expendable, 3DMark2001
Quake3 Arena
Aquamark, TrueSpace PubBench
TrueSpace Ray Tracing, Video Editing
XP Performnance
Conclusion
 Shootout above 2 GHz    
Northwood vs. Willamette vs. Athlon XP
(Review by MS, January 7, 2002)
Quake3 Arena (Win98SE)

Quake3 Arena has always been one of the strongest applications for the P4. We were using point release 1.30 with the built-in four.dm_66 demo and the new DLLs posted recently that speed things up a bit. To make a long story short, originally, these DLLs were supposed to mostly increase the performance of the Athlon, however, we see exactly the same increase that is 14% across the board with all CPUs used. But then, I thought we should speed things up a bit and that is exactly what we did.


512 x 384 Fastest

I remember a report from about 2 years ago about a built-in frame limitation of Quake 3 Arena to no more than 100 fps. Funny how times change. Anyway, we see the 2.2 and the 2.0 pulling ahead of the XP2000+ which still leads the Willamette.

512 x 384 Fast

With slightly increasing bandwidth requirements, the three top scores pretty much even out. Differences are in the noise but the 2.2 GHz Northwood is still marginally faster.

640 x 480 Normal

At the Normal setting, the 2.0 GHz Northwood and the XP2000+ are head to head. The difference is purely statistical at this setting

800 x 600 High Quality

At the High Quality setting, the higher memory bandwidth of the VIA KT266A chipset pushes the XP 2000+ ahead of the Northwood 2.0 GHz but the Athlon still cannot catch the 2.2 GHz Intel flagship processor.

In summary, at lower resolution, the raw power of the Northwood with all its optimizations for Quake3 Arena gives it a clear victory over the AMD XP 2000+. With increasing resolution, the differences become smaller and at the high quality setting, the XP2000+ overtakes the 2.0 GHz Northwood.

next page:    => What about Aquamark and Caligari TS4.2 =>

Click here! All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits