Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Dual Cores
Numbers and Test Configurations
Synthetic CPU and Memory Benchmarks
WorldBench5
Cinebench 2003
Lightwave [8], 3dsmax
TrueSpace and CPU power
3Dmark '05
Gaming Performance
Idle and max Power
Prime95 and Final Thoughts

Give Us Some Feedback on this Review

 Intel's P4 820D and 670
More Power to Duallies
(Review by MS September 3, 2005)
P4-670

Application Benchmarks: CineBench 2003

Maxxon's Cinebench does not need much introduction but briefly, the benchmark features a still life ray tracing benchmark that is run in either single or multithreaded mode and a few realtime rendering approaches that are basically single-threaded.


Raytracing: Single Thread

Raw clock speed rules here, along with cache size and memory latency, which are conditions that are not expected to make the P4 820 happy.

Allowing parallel execution of multiple threads boosts the 820's performance beyond that of any single core

Cinema4D shading is - once again - single threaded and the 820 falls way behind the 670, which takes the crown, courtesy of its supreme clock speed

Both Software (above) and Hardware-accelerated (below) OpenGL benchmarks are single threaded and do not show the 820 in a favorable light

Pentium4 820 D
(dual core)

next page: => 3D Rendering =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits