Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
New Performance Panoramas
A Memory Address Space Crash Course
System Configuration
Disk Caching?
System Memory Density Impact
WoW, WinXP and WinXP-64
Conclusion
Discuss this article here:

 Panorama Factory and the $64-bit Question
What's in a Benchmark...?
(Review by MS, September 2, 2004)
OCZ PC3200 DUAL-CHANNEL EL DDR 512MB(256X2)
400MHz DDR CAS2 - PLATINUM

Test Configuration

We benchmarked the different scripts of Panorama Factory in the following hardware configuration:

Hardware
  • AMD Athlon-64-FX53
  • ASUS SK8V Deluxe
  • 4 (2) x 512 MB Mushkin PC3200 Registered ECC DDR
    2GB (1GB) Total System Memory Density
  • ATI RADEON X800 Pro
  • Sony DVD Drive
  • Western Digital WD400JB
  • Swapfile size manually set to 10 GB
Software
  • WindowsXP 64-bit Edition
  • Build 3790
  • SP1 v.1069
  • PanoramaFactory (Supplied by AMD)
  • no other drivers*

*we already mentioned that at the time of the review there were no compatible ATI 64 -bit drivers publicly available, also, the VIA chipset drivers supplied with the 64-bit edition of Windows XP appear to work just fine and the Hyperion drivers only add support for RAID etc.


One thing that almost goes without saying is the fact that the amount of system memory will play a critical role, especially in applications commanding several GBytes of memory. In general, the same principle applies to greater amounts of system memory as does to 64-bit computing vs. 32-bit computing, the access of the data is much faster and that will reflect in better system performance. On the other hand, with wider and deeper registers on the CPU, changes in the amount of system memory may cause different effects on the 32-bit application than on the 64-bit application.

Performance Variability

For starters, let's take a look at the difference in performance in consecutive runs without rebooting when only one GB of memory was used.

     

Left: 32-bit version of Panorama Factory, right: 64-bit version of Panorama Factory, in both cases, system memory was 2 x 512 MB DDR in Dual Channel mode. Green: 1st Run, Red: 2nd run, shorter is better

At first glance it appears as if there is a general performance increase in repetitive runs, however, a closer look reveals that the performance differences are limited mostly to processes that are one way or the other I/O related. That is, mostly the "Read", "Write" and curiously the "Crop" functions are affected. Interestingly, the trend in the tasks mentioned was reversed in the 64-bit vs. the 32-bit application, however, this may not necessarily be representative.

next page:      => Performance at 2 GB System Memory =>

All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits