Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:

Mainboards

ABIT
ASUS
Chaintech
Shuttle
Soyo
Tyan

CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:


























































































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top
Technical Details
Benchmark Considerations
Gigabyte GA-7DX vs. VIA Reference Board
Shuttle AK31 Rev. 3.1
Driver Issues, Test Configurations
Quake3 Arena, Expendable Timedemo
Caligari TrueSpace 4.2 Animated Benchmark
Caligari 5.1 Raytracing, Ulead MediaStudio Pro 6.0
Conclusion
 Athlon XP1800+   
QuantiSpeed in the Crossfire
(Review by MS, October 14, 2001)

Performance

What about starting with the prime benchmark for the P4, that is Quake3 Arena? Historically, no AMD system has been able to touch the performance of the Pentium4 with its dual Rambus memory interface on the Intel i850. Recently, as we showed, the SIS 645 reference board, using 333 MHz DDR did outperform the i850 mainboard, though, and set some new records. Time to check how the AthlonXP stacks up against a fierce competition.


Quake3 Arena Demo 001

Fastest, 512 x 384 x 16 bpp

Average frame rates in Demo 001. On the AMD chipset-based Gigabyte board, the Athlon XP 1800+ limps behind the competition, however, the VIA Reference board and the Shuttle AK31 show off and, even at stock speed, hardly yield to the i850 platform, the VIA P4X266-based Shuttle AV40 still gets respectable scores but is unable to secure a leading position. The clear winner is the SIS 645 platform, however, the overclocked Athlon XP is the first AMD CPU to slash a gaping wound into the P4 phalanx by outperforming the i850 / P4 combination at a substantially lower clock speed.

Normal, 640 x 480 x 16 bpp

Moving to the "Normal setting doesn't change anything except that the gap between the i850 and the overclocked Athlon XP widens. The SIS 645 reference board still maintains its position as performance leader with a slim margin. Results with the AK31 using the 21.81 nVidia drivers were excluded form the graphs since they were too low.

At the Fast and High Quality settings we saw the same pattern which is why we skip these settings. Time to move on to another, memory and FPU intensive benchmark: Expendable.

Expendable Timedemo (640 x 480 x 16)

Expendable Timedemo average frame rates. For comparative purposes, the 21.81 driver scores with the Shuttle AK31 are included. On a QuantiSpeed by real clock comparison, the Athlon XP still achieves an average of over 40% performance advantage over the Pentium 4. Clock by clock comparisons would be interesting to discuss but unfair since the P4 was designed for high clock speed.

Gaming applications are more and more limited by the capabilities of the graphics card, rather by the CPU power, Content Creation applications are still limited by raw CPU power. Time to move on.

next page:    => Caligari trueSpace 4.2 =>

Click here! All advice and educational articles on LostCircuits are free, but if you feel you can, please make a small donation to us!
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 2002 - 2008 LostCircuits