header image
Home
Contact Us
xoxide
PC Hardware
Login Form
Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
Home arrow amd arrow AMD's Phenom II X4 965 BE C3
AMD's Phenom II X4 965 BE C3 Print E-mail
Written by Michael Schuette   
Nov 01, 2009 at 11:00 PM



Test Configuration and Power Measurements

We tested the Phenom II X4 965 BE "C3" in the following system configuration:

  • Motherboard: ASUS M4A79T
  • Memory: OCZ3ALVE16004GK
  • CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition (C3 stepping)
  • Cooler: OCZ Vendetta 2
  • Graphics Card: ASUS EAH5850
  • HDD: HDD: WD 1500ADFD (Raptor)
  • SSD: Intel SSDSA2MH080G15E (80 GB)
  • Optical Drive: HP dvd1070i-H01 6 Multiformat DVD writer
  • PSU: OCZ EvoStream (720W)

** The memory was run at 1600 MHz 8-8-8

Benchmark Overview

  • Windows 7 64 (RTM)*
  • CPU-Z 1.52
  • Caligari TrueSpace 5.1
  • Microsoft Excel
  • MainConcept H.264
  • Cinebench R10

* We used a fresh install of Windows 7 -64-bit (RTM) and ran through our usual suite of benchmarks to find that there was only a negligible performance inmprovement on the new revision compared to the original '965 BE release

Power Measurements

Looking at system power consumption is interesting to a certain degree, however, for all practical purposes we are more interested in the isolated CPU power consumption. To estimate the latter, we used the same power measurement setup as in previous reports. Briefly, we used a Fluke 80i-410 AC/DC current probe in combination with a Wavetek Meterman 30XR multimeter to measure current through the isolated +12V supply lines feeding into the CPU VRM. To increase granularity of the measurements, we ran the supply lines in a triple loop through the clamp. The clamp itself was calibrated using a BK Precision model 1692, 30V 40 A DC power supply. Since there is a temperature dependency of the probe, we monitored the zero-current offset at the beginning of each measurement as well as at the end of each run. If the values drifted we retook the measurements. Despite these precautions there are possible deviations of the read-out from the real current, however, these errors mostly affect the lower (processor idle) measurements. We estimate that the errors should not be more than 10% at the lower end of the data and less than 5% in the mid and higher data range. Moreover, since the same procedures were applied to all processors tested, there may be an offset in the absolute numbers, however, the relation of the individual cores to each other with respect to power consumption should be fairly accurate.

Having learned our lessons regarding power measurements on the Nehalem platform, we verified that the 4+1 phases of the VRM receive their power from the 12V auxiliary power plug by ohming out the connections between the MOSFETs and the plug on one side and the MOSFETs and CPU socket on the other side. In theory, showing the electrical continuity does not exclude additional supply power coming in from the 24 pin main eATX connector, however, we also checked there and got "open circuit" readings. This means that we can with reasonable certainty claim that the entire CPU power, including cores and NB/IMC (but excluding I/O power) is derived exclusively from the auxiliary 4-pin 12V input. Details are given on this page.

In addition to the method outlined above, we used a modified PSU to run the 12V line directly through the Wavetek Meterman and read out the current. Both methods gave identical results.



Last Updated ( Nov 21, 2009 at 12:02 PM )
<Previous Article   Next Article>
NIA in action, what fun!

badge
We have 50 guests online