| ASUS RADEON EAH5850 |
|
|
| Written by Michael Schuette | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oct 21, 2009 at 11:04 AM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page 1 of 12
To give credit where credit is due, the reference design was done by ATI and all current cards are following it. Notwithstanding, there are differences between manufacturers, primarily with respect to features, warranty and some of the bundled software. ASUS advertises the EAH5850 to be equipped with their “voltage tweak” technology, enabled in software through the “smart doctor” utility, which also allows independent overclocking of core and memory. To ensure that everybody feels safe about these features, ASUS backs its products with a three year warranty. Similar to XFX, Sapphire and HIS, ASUS also includes a coupon for a complimentary copy of Colin McRae Dirt2, to be released on December 11, 2009 through Steam.
RADEON HD 5850 Technology At One Glance In short, the GPU used in the 5850 series is the same as that used in the 5870 series, albeit running at a lower clock speed and with 2 of the 20 SIMD arrays disabled. Each of the SIMD arrays features 80 stream processors, hence the total number of ALUs comes down from 1600 to 1440. Since each of the array is associated with a texture unit, the number of the latter also drops to 18 units capable of generating 72 texels per clock (four texels per unit and clock). In classic ATI fashion, the naming convention calls for the "Pro" suffix, so that we have a Cypress Pro GPU powering the 5850 series as opposed to the full-fledged Cypress GPU on the 5870 models. The other difference between the 5850 and its big brother is the lower clock speed of the GPU and memory. Whereas the Cypress GPU is typically clocked at 850 MHz, the Cypress Pro is chucking along at a slightly more relaxed pace of 725 MHz for the Core, likewise, the memory clock is reduced from 1200 MHz to 1000 MHz or 4Gbps data rate using GDDR5. For a quick comparison of the raw technical specs of the current offerings in the high-end graphics sector, we put everything into an "easy-viewing" table:
Aside from other architectural idiosyncrasies, one of the most obvious differences between the current nVidia and AMD strategies is the memory interface and choice of memory components. AMD has very early on embraced GDDR5 with four transactions per clock whereas nVidia's current offerings are still using GDDR3 with 2 transactions per clock. At the same time, AMD's memory interface is only 256 bit wide whereas nVidia uses twice the bus width so that by the end of the day, the net result is the same. At least in the same ball park.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated ( Feb 14, 2010 at 02:15 AM ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| <Previous Article | Next Article> |
|---|