Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home

. .


CPU
Intel
P4 840 D
P4 820 D
P4 630
P4 640
P4 650
P4 660
P4 670

AMD
Athlon64
3500+
3700+
3800+
4000+
X2-3800+
X2-4200+
X2-4400+
X2-4600+
X2-4800+

1-Way Opteron
Opteron 144
Opteron 146
Opteron 148
Opteron 150
Opteron 152

2-Way Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246
Opteron 248
Opteron 250
Opteron 252

2-Way Dual Core Opteron
Opteron 270
Opteron 275

nVidia
GF 7800GT
GF 6800GT
GF 6600GT

ATI
R X850 XT PE
R X850 XT
R X800 XT PE
R X800 XT
R X800 XL

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?







































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top page
setup and background
Corsair CAS-2
EMS HSDRAM 150
Mushkin Rev. 2
misconceptions and conclusions
 Corsair PC133 CL-2, Mushkin PC133 High Performance Rev.2, Enhanced Memory Systems HSDRAM 150   
The Hall of Fame (150 MHz at CAS-2)
(Review by MS, September 20, 2000)

Summary

We have rounded up a number of high end DIMMs and tested them for the ablity to run above the arbitrary number of 150 MHz at CAS-2 settings as well as to run at least 160 MHz stable at CAS-3. Test systems were based on the ASUS CUSL2 (Intel i815E) and the MSI K7T Pro (VIA KT 133). The final survivers of this round up were the new Corsair PC133 CL-2, the Mushkin High Performance Rev.2 and the Enhanced Memory Systems HSDRAM 150 DIMMs. At 2:2:2 (CAS delay, RAS-to-CAS delay, Precharge) both the Corsair and the Mushkin DIMMs ran with supreme stability up to 153 MHz. The Enhanced Memory Systems HSDRAM 150, needing a RAS-to-CAS delay of 3 cycles ran at CAS-2 up to 166 MHz. Both the Corsair and the Mushkin DIMM had no problem running 166 MHz either, albeit at CAS-3 setting. In terms of performance all DIMMs were identical at the same timing settings.


Unfortunately, at the moment, technical progress is once again hindered by legal issues. More specifically, everyone who has been waiting for DDR as the new and improved memory interface will most likely have to wait a little bit longer, for the obvious reason that, regardless of how strong everyone in the DRAM industry feels about the claims made by either Rambus or the rest of the world, the issue is still not resolved. That, in turn, causes a certain cautiousness since nobody wants to invest in technologies that could theoretically be wiped out by a simple stroke of a pen or to face exorbitant royalties, possibly charged retroactively.

In real life, the situation is not quite as pessimistic but we still won’t see DDR hitting the market as promised, that is, early to mid September. In turn, that means that the Christmas season is lost and, consequently, in the last three to four weeks, the concerted efforts of pushing DDR to market appear to have suffered from a severe decrease of enthusiasm. Optimistically, we won’t expect DDR enabled mainboards until late October, a more pessimistic view does not see them until December this year.

CPU speed, on the other hand is steadily increasing and, in order to keep up with the raw processing power of the PIII or Athlon, a few tricks are needed. A few weeks ago, we posted our performance analysis of Latency vs. Bandwidth. A few days later, we noticed a similar article on Tom’s Hardware, entitled the 150 MHz Project. No pun intended, there is nothing wrong with that, great minds think alike, but what was interesting to read was the claim that there is currently no memory available that is capable of stable operation at 150 MHz and CAS latency of 2. This is of particular importance, since latency is the more crucial factor for overall performance, as we showed in the previous article.

On the other hand, there is a certain truth to the statement on Tom’s hardware, as there are not too many DIMMs currently available that run stable at or beyond 150 MHz and a CAS latency of 2.

We have been snooping around and gathered a few of those and put them on the stand. We did request more but upon hearing our criteria to be included in this round-up which were:

  • Stable operation at 150 MHz and CAS-2
  • Stable operation at 160 MHz and CAS-3 (not possible on the VIA KT133 platform, due to chipset limitations).

    We couldn’t get all manufacturers contacted to participate, some others sent us their modules but since they didn’t make it, we consider it a matter of professional courtesy not to mention them further in this specific context.

    next page:    => next page =>

    Click Here!

    If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
    Thank you!

    General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
    All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
    Copyright 1998 - 2007 LostCircuits