|
Advice Beginners BIOS Guide CPUs Links Mainboards Memory Network Storage Video/Sound Cards Contact Forum SiteMap Sponsors WebNews Home
|
. | . |
|
CPU Intel P4 840 D P4 820 D P4 630 P4 640 P4 650 P4 660 P4 670 AMD Athlon64 3500+ 3700+ 3800+ 4000+ X2-3800+ X2-4200+ X2-4400+ X2-4600+ X2-4800+ 1-Way Opteron Opteron 144 Opteron 146 Opteron 148 Opteron 150 Opteron 152 2-Way Opteron Opteron 240 Opteron 242 Opteron 244 Opteron 246 Opteron 248 Opteron 250 Opteron 252 2-Way Dual Core Opteron Opteron 270 Opteron 275 nVidia GF 7800GT GF 6800GT GF 6600GT ATI R X850 XT PE R X850 XT R X800 XT PE R X800 XT R X800 XL Memory Corsair Crucial Kingston Mushkin OCZ |
LOSTCIRCUITS |
|
| DDR-II Roundup The State of the Art | |
|
(Review by John Cook, May 19, 2005) |
|
256 MB OCZ Low Latency DDR (I) Starting at: |
Summary
DDR2 is becoming more and more a factor in the memory industry. Despite the fact that it is currently limited to the Intel Pentium4 platform, the market share has increased not only in the OEM market but we also see some higher acceptance in the enthusiast community. We have taken a number of samples from manufacturers such as Corsair, GeIL, Mushkin, Kingston and PDP and ran it through the different paces with synthetic benchmarks and real world applications.
Editorial Preface: This article expresses the sole view of the author and has been edited only for language and terminologic accuracy
Memory technologies are in an almost constant state of flux. What seems like cutting edge advancement in the form of released products, has actually been in various stages of R&D for years. When DDR2 was released this past year to somewhat of a mixed reception, Intel, DDR2 memory manufacturers, and Intel’s motherboard partners were left slack jawed at both the lukewarm sales and the growing inventory given the expense and preparation put into DDR2 technologies. Several factors conspired to keep DDR2 from moving as fast as anticipated. Of those, a poor economical environment, the relative comparative performance offered between present systems at launch between established DDR and the newer DDR2 systems, and to a point the competition offered by the Athlon64 processor held people to consider the leap to DDR2 questionable.

Because of potential conflicts of interest, OCZ DDR2 modules are excluded from this review
Almost a year has passed since the release of the 925x chipset and DDR2 PC memory was launched. What have we learned in that year, and what may now make DDR2 a more viable option? This could easily devolve into a forum thread from hell in many cases, but to be brief, I will say that the introduction of the 925XE or nVidia's SLI chipset, as well as the decreases in pricing of DDR2, have made the LGA775 option more justifiable as an upgrade path for many users. I’m not saying all users should run, jump, or speed ahead on this path towards computer nirvana. However, if you are in the market for a socket T/LGA775 setup, the time may be now to consider DDR2 as your future upgrade choice.
Today we are concentrating our focus on several sets of DDR2 memory that promise to hold your interest over the next few pages. We have a little bit of everything with regards to memory speed, latencies, price, and quite a few brands many of us have grown to love. Absent is OCZ, for obvious reasons since any favorable results could be construed as skewed. I however will miss them in this roundup as their modules have performed very well for me in the past. That said, let’s consider out test platform and discuss some limitations of the data collected.
|
OCZ 2 x 512 MB PC2-4200 DDR2 RAM |
next page: => The Test Setup (and it's limitations) =>
If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.