Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home

. .


CPU
Intel
P4 840 D
P4 820 D
P4 630
P4 640
P4 650
P4 660
P4 670

AMD
Athlon64
3500+
3700+
3800+
4000+
X2-3800+
X2-4200+
X2-4400+
X2-4600+
X2-4800+

1-Way Opteron
Opteron 144
Opteron 146
Opteron 148
Opteron 150
Opteron 152

2-Way Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246
Opteron 248
Opteron 250
Opteron 252

2-Way Dual Core Opteron
Opteron 270
Opteron 275

nVidia
GF 7800GT
GF 6800GT
GF 6600GT

ATI
R X850 XT PE
R X850 XT
R X800 XT PE
R X800 XT
R X800 XL

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?







































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top page
Realigning the Focus
The Bumpy Road to DDR400
The SPD Fiasco
The Candidates
Test Beds and Methods
SPD Readouts
2:2:2-6 Performance
2:3:2-6 Performance
Relaxed Latencies
Conclusions

Your Comments?

 DDR400   
The New Platform
(Review by MS, May 6, 2003)


After Midnight...

So we are just going to do it, that is, we are going to run everything at the highest latency settings. That is, we are sticking with CAS-2.5 since the majority of modules would not support the CAS-3 setting to begin with for the simple lack of necessary pipeline stages in the DRAM output path


All of a sudden, the Samsung Original and the KingMax modules take off but then, we had a surprise element in the form of some older Mushkin Level2 PC2100 DIMMs that would not work at CAS-2 either. Those modules were based on the Samsung C-Revision but even the Samsung Originals based on the D-Rev all of a sudden look very appealing.

A stripped Level-2

they don't make'em like that anymore.

Another Frank Perdue here, no skin.... I didn't even realize the wizened age of the module until I looked at the picture. Cameras don't lie, there is dust, there are scratches on the contacts and then, there are these numbers shown above and below

at 300 MHz FSB with the memory at the 320 MHz setting for a total of DDR480 which is not even getting close to scratching the limits of the DIMM yet. At the 1:1 setting, we were running 255/255 MHz but that would still not give the overall bandwidth of the asynchronous setting.... and since screenshots are what it is all about..

next page:    => Conclusions =>

Click Here!

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2007 LostCircuits