Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home

. .


CPU
Intel
P4 840 D
P4 820 D
P4 630
P4 640
P4 650
P4 660
P4 670

AMD
Athlon64
3500+
3700+
3800+
4000+
X2-3800+
X2-4200+
X2-4400+
X2-4600+
X2-4800+

1-Way Opteron
Opteron 144
Opteron 146
Opteron 148
Opteron 150
Opteron 152

2-Way Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246
Opteron 248
Opteron 250
Opteron 252

2-Way Dual Core Opteron
Opteron 270
Opteron 275

nVidia
GF 7800GT
GF 6800GT
GF 6600GT

ATI
R X850 XT PE
R X850 XT
R X800 XT PE
R X800 XT
R X800 XL

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?







































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top page
Realigning the Focus
The Bumpy Road to DDR400
The SPD Fiasco
The Candidates
Test Beds and Methods
SPD Readouts
2:2:2-6 Performance
2:3:2-6 Performance
Relaxed Latencies
Conclusions

Your Comments?

 DDR400   
The New Platform
(Review by MS, May 6, 2003)


Test Platforms

  • Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz @ 800 MHz FSB
  • ASUS P4C800
  • Latest Intel Chipset drivers
  • nVidia Quadro4 XGL980
  • Seagate Barracuda ATA V
  • 2 x Seagate Barracuda SATA 7 (120 BBGB)
  • Shuttle 52X CDROM
  • Logitech RM67A cordless optical mouse
  • Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz @ 800 MHz FSB
  • Intel D875PBZ
  • Tyan Tachyon R9700 Pro
  • Windows XP Corporate Edition
  • Service Pack 1
  • Detonator 41.09
  • SiSoft Sandra 2003
  • Caligari TrueSpace PubBench D3D
  • ViewPerf 7.0 DRV-08


Test Methods

We used the Intel D875PBZ in barebone configuration to check the SPD of each module. There are programs like c't SPD, however, the latest version we saw had still some bugs and we are, for once, confident in Intel that their own mainboards correctly read the SPD and adjust the timings accordingly.

The need to use the Intel House-brand arose from the fact that it turned out that the ASUS P4C800 does not read the SPD at all, one thing we overlooked in our review. Instead, at least the BIOS version we were using substitutes the generic 2.5:4:4:8 latencies which is a typical feature of AMI BIOSes.

The Intel board, on the other hand, does not allow overclocking, which is, where the ASUS board came in handy. For frequency testing, we manually set the latencies to the desired values, the same goes for the DDR voltages. We then increased the bus frequency in synchronous mode until the system crashed in either Caligari TrueSpace or DRV-08, both of which are very memory intensive applications. The frequencies we show as ceiling for each module are those where the system was running 100% stable. We would have liked to use Ultra-X RST-Pro, however, the card is not recognized as bootable device by the P4C800, thus we had to rely on software and system crashes. For the record, we ended up with a number of corrupted BIOS and operating systems requiring either the use of ASUS' "Crash-Free BIOS2", which we found works flawlessly, or format c: followed by a complete install of WindowsXP.

next page:    => SPD Results =>

Click Here!

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2007 LostCircuits