Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home

. .


CPU
Intel
P4 840 D
P4 820 D
P4 630
P4 640
P4 650
P4 660
P4 670

AMD
Athlon64
3500+
3700+
3800+
4000+
X2-3800+
X2-4200+
X2-4400+
X2-4600+
X2-4800+

1-Way Opteron
Opteron 144
Opteron 146
Opteron 148
Opteron 150
Opteron 152

2-Way Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246
Opteron 248
Opteron 250
Opteron 252

2-Way Dual Core Opteron
Opteron 270
Opteron 275

nVidia
GF 7800GT
GF 6800GT
GF 6600GT

ATI
R X850 XT PE
R X850 XT
R X800 XT PE
R X800 XT
R X800 XL

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?







































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top page
intro to latency
CAS-3 vs CAS-2
133 MHz
154 MHz
166 MHz
harmonics and odd frequencies
bandwidth at 143 MHz
3D performance at 143 MHz
conclusion
 Latency vs. Bandwidth, a performance analysis   
Life Beyond 150 MHz
(Review by MS, August 15, 2000)


Summary

We have evaluated the impact of DRAM latency and memory bus frequency on bandwidth and gaming performance in a step by step performance evaluation from 100 to 166 MHz memory bus frequency with varying latency settings. All benchmarks were run at a constant 1 GHz processor clock speed which allowed us to eliminate influence of different processor power and to directly evaluate the impact of memory operating frequency and latency on the overall system performance. We focus on 3D applications in order to bypass the usage of the integrated L1 and L2 cache. As platform, we chose the Intel i815 chipset based ASUS CUSL2 and an unlocked Intel Pentium III Coppermine processor. Our results show that stepping up from a 100 MHz (3:3:3) memory bus to 166 MHz (2:3:2) yields 78% and 89% measured enhancement in CPU and FPU memory bandwidth, respectively, translating into 22.2% higher system performance (frame rates). The current report concludes that, as memory bandwidth increases, latencies become the limiting factor in overall system performance. The performance increase gained, compared to 100 MHz ( 3:3:3) rates equivalent to increasing the CPU speed by about 400 MHz.


Intel recently showed in an internal study that, even within specs, the PC133 interface provides performance at least equivalent to the Rambus design. The emphasis here is on running within specs. That means that in an official white paper, apples need to be compared to apples. A twist of this situation is that Rambus is not an interface that is friendly to overclockers, on the other hand, the standard SDRAM interface has evolved to a degree where system bus frequencies in excess of 150 MHz are no longer impossible. It is established, though, that increasing the system and particularly the memory bus speed are proven methods to enhance the overall system performance, especially in view of the system RAM-to-CPU bandwidth limitation. These considerations are of increasing importance, not only with regard to overclockers but are becoming extremely relevant issues with respect to platform evaluations that, in essence, are the basis for the future roadmaps with chipset and processor manufacturers alike. Thus far, there have been speculations, models and estimates, however, a detailed performance evaluation needs yet to be published.

How much does the performance really depend on the system memory bus frequency and latencies? Within specs, this question is easy to answer with several current chipsets where the DRAM-to-CPU ratio can be selected within the BIOS. That is, at 133 MHz front side bus (or rather external CPU speed), both VIA 133A and Intel i815 chipsets offer the possibility of running the memory bus at either 100 or 133 MHz without changing any of the other system parameters as PCI or AGP speed.

When going beyond these standard settings, probably the most crucial problem is to maintain a constant clock speed. This is of utmost importance, since otherwise the clock speed delta would mask the change in performance caused by the parameters we are actually interested in: bandwidth and latency.

Under overclocked conditions, the situation is even getting a bit more complicated since every increase of the external CPU speed also causes a proportional increase in the PCI and AGP bus. Thus, the performance gain can no longer be solely attributed to the increase memory data transfer caused by a higher operating frequency. There is no way to eliminate this factor, however, for latency issues the impact of PCI and AGP bus is non-existent.

next page:    => next page =>

Click Here!

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2007 LostCircuits