|
Advice Beginners BIOS Guide CPUs Links Mainboards Memory Network Storage Video/Sound Cards Contact Forum SiteMap Sponsors WebNews Home
|
. | . |
|
CPU Intel P4 840 D P4 820 D P4 630 P4 640 P4 650 P4 660 P4 670 AMD Athlon64 3500+ 3700+ 3800+ 4000+ X2-3800+ X2-4200+ X2-4400+ X2-4600+ X2-4800+ 1-Way Opteron Opteron 144 Opteron 146 Opteron 148 Opteron 150 Opteron 152 2-Way Opteron Opteron 240 Opteron 242 Opteron 244 Opteron 246 Opteron 248 Opteron 250 Opteron 252 2-Way Dual Core Opteron Opteron 270 Opteron 275 nVidia GF 7800GT GF 6800GT GF 6600GT ATI R X850 XT PE R X850 XT R X800 XT PE R X800 XT R X800 XL Memory Corsair Crucial Kingston Mushkin OCZ |
LOSTCIRCUITS |
|
| OCZ PC3700 EL "Gold" and some glitter... | |
| (Review by MS, July 10, 2003) |
Results
Against the recommendations of OCZ, we tested the PC3700 at 2:2:2-7 and 2:3:2:7 on either platform and the results were nothing short of catastrophic. At 2:2:2 on the nForce2 platform, the PC3700 would not even pass at 200 MHz, on the Springdale platforms, the results were slightly better in that the modules were able to run at 205 MHz at 2:3:2. Keep in mind that we were ignoring the recommendations of the manufacturer who rather clearly states that 2:3:3 is required for proper functionality. As reference, we include Corsair XMS3200v1.1.
nForce2, 2:3:2

Even with a relaxed tRCD (3T) the OCZ DIMMs did not pass at 200 MHz on the nForce2 chipset as long as tRP was kept at 2T.
nForce2, 2:3:3

Increasing tRP to 3T completely reformed the OCZ DIMMs that were able to run now at 217 MHz
Springdale Platform
The above is not too surprising since the OCZ site clearly states the limitations of the DIMMs with respect to both latency and platform requirements. The next step was to retest both sets of modules on the two Springdale boards, which yielded almost identical results.
Springdale, 2:3:2

Again, tRP of 2T does not cut it, which is somewhat surprising but in line with the OCZ specs.
Springdale, 2:3:3

Setting tRP to 3 allowed error-free operation up to 229 MHz. Above that frequency, errors started occurring and increasing with each frequency stepping. For the record, the DIMMs would still "run" up to 236 MHz. As it turned out, this limitation appears mostly CAS latency related.
Springdale, 2.5:4:4

Increasing CAS latency to 2.5 allowed us to push the DIMMs up to 250 MHz at 2.5:3:3 and 255 MHz at 2.5:4:4.
next page: => Conclusion =>
If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.