Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home

. .


CPU
Intel
P4 840 D
P4 820 D
P4 630
P4 640
P4 650
P4 660
P4 670

AMD
Athlon64
3500+
3700+
3800+
4000+
X2-3800+
X2-4200+
X2-4400+
X2-4600+
X2-4800+

1-Way Opteron
Opteron 144
Opteron 146
Opteron 148
Opteron 150
Opteron 152

2-Way Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246
Opteron 248
Opteron 250
Opteron 252

2-Way Dual Core Opteron
Opteron 270
Opteron 275

nVidia
GF 7800GT
GF 6800GT
GF 6600GT

ATI
R X850 XT PE
R X850 XT
R X800 XT PE
R X800 XT
R X800 XL

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?







































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top page
Registers and Buffers
Blueprints, Components
and Modules

Test Setup, Verification
Sandra, Cachemem
First Results
Some Differences
The Big Difference
Conclusions

Please Give Us Some Feedback

Memory Pricing

 Registered ECC DDR400    
for the Athlon64 FX and Opteron
(Review by MS, October 3, 2003)


Gaming Performance

To use gaming performance as an indicator for memory performance is a double-edged sword, there are tons of pitfalls in the form of CPU or graphics limitations masking what is going on on the memory level. We have a few example of both sides of the coin, meaning, we have gaming benchmarks that will not show any difference whatsoever along with some that ... well, we are going to save the best for last.


Aquamark3

For Aquamark3, the only thing that really matters is the graphics card performance, therefore, it is no surprise that there are hardly any differences between the different modules.

Comanche4

Interestingly, there is very little difference with Comanche4 either. The bottleneck is distributed somewhere between the CPU and the graphics card with some small effect of the memory.

In the past, we have often seen a more or less pronounced impact of the memory performance on some of the SPEC ViewPERF benchmarks, a prime example being Data Explorer (DX-07). We used the ATI FireGL X1 in this case since it makes little sense to run professional benchmarks on consumer graphics cards.

DX-07

The differences in SPEC are almost non-existent and DX-07 is the best case scenario.

By now, we have seen some synthetic benchmarks showing very pronounced differences in bandwidth and a number of gaming benchmarks that appeared to be completely insensitive to those issues. But then, as we said, we are going to safe the best for last.

next page:    => OpenGL II, Some Differences At Last =>

Click Here!

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2007 LostCircuits