Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:
CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:








































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top Page
At One Glance
Bundle, VRM
Layout
Connectors
BIOS
System Configuration
Overclocking

SiSoft Sandra and DIMM Slot mapping
PATA, SATA and Serillel
Business Winstones
Content Creation
Gaming Performance
Conclusions
The good, the bad and the ugly

Your comments?

ABit Mainboards Online

 ABit NF7-S   
Salmon for Joel
(Review by MS, February, 25 2003)
HDD Performance

In any of today's high-end desktop computers, the I/O interface or more specifically the hard disk drive is the predominant bottleneck. Serial ATA promises some alleviation of the bottleneck by elimiating the master - slave arbitration scheme as well as the command overhead and polling latencies associated with deferred execution of parallel commands. In other words, since these improvements are done on the controller / interface level, it is very conceivable that just adding a bridge connector like ABit's Serillel adapter will yield a disproportionate performance increase. Needless to say that the improvements will only be overt in workloads that are not limited by the internal drive performance, which is dependent on platter data density and rotational speed. In other words, don't expect HDTach to show any differences in sequential read / writes.


Where differences will show up are workloads that are depending on small chunks of data in multiple transactions and the prime benchmark for this scenario is oh-so-outdated Winbench99. We took two Seagate Barracuda V to compare the Parallel ATA with the Native Serial ATA drive and the Parallel drive using the Serillel adapter. For the record, the SATA drive is an 80GB drive with three heads whereas the PATA drive is the 120 GB version featuring four heads which causes slightly different performance characteristics, nonetheless, the results simply blew us away. We used the SiliconImage 10027 driver revision that provide a major improvement over the 10022 or older SiI drivers.

Red: Barracuda ATA-V, turquois: Same drive using Serillel adapter, grey: Barracuda SATA-V. The FrontPage98 results are scaled 1:10 for better resolution of the other benchmarks.

It is pretty obvious that the results vary from one application to the other but that we already knew. What we did not know is that the Serillel adapter by itself more than doubles the performance in the Business DiskMark and AVS Express and shows similar improvements in some of the other individual sub-benchmarks. Very impressive to say the least. Keep in mind that the correct drivers are a key feature here.

next page:    => WinStones =>

Click here! If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed