Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:
CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:








































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top
Specs
Features, power circuitry
Layout
Jumpers Galore, Connectors
BIOS
Test Configuration, Stability, Overclocking
HD Tach, SiSoft Sandra Memory Bandwdith,
Expendable, Quake3 Arena
ULead, Caligari
Conclusion
 ASUS A7V266-E (VIA KT266A chipset)   
A Raw Diamond
(Review by MS, 11/2001)


Summary

After more or less skipping the VIA KT266 chipset, ASUS releases its view of what a KT266A chipset-based mainboard is supposed to look like. Loaded with features like support for the iPanel, SmartCard reader and onboard CMedia 6-channel sound including SPDIF support, the A7V266-E is bound for success. Using new power-supply technology supplied by ON-Semiconductor with the MOSFET drivers integrated in the core controller, ASUS does away with 2 phases, yet manages to achieve a superlative in stability, particularly under overclocked conditions. In some applications, the A7V266-E does not quite reach the performance of competing boards, other applications see the board outperforming the competition. Some issues remain with the board in terms of what appears to be redundant jumpers and some BIOS explanations could use some polishing as well to fit the actual settings. Some other issues concern the hardware monitor interfacing, particularly core voltage and temperature monitoring. Despite these shortcomings, the A7V266-E is probably the way to go for a high-end platform for the Athlon Palomino.


One major hole in the mainboard scenery of this year has been the lack of any VIA KT266-based board made by ASUS. Where everybody else struggled with the intricacies of the VIA chipset and its, well, we don't want to call them bugs, Asus appeared to sit back and let everybody else figure it out. In retrospect, this appears like a wise decision since there were quite a few boards that went through several revisions before there was something that qualified as a final version. Particularly unhelpful in the development of the new KT266 boards was a very minor detail. The KT266 could run the memory bus either in ECC mode or else in non-ECC mode (regardless of whether ECC memory was present) but the difference was in the hardwiring of the traces. Some manufacturers caught the bug with changing the resistor configuration of the board (MSI) others used a completely redesigned PCB to increase the memory performance (e.g. Shuttle).

There were some KT 266-based ASUS board circulating in the far east, some reached the US and US-based review sites but all these boards had one thing in common: they were very inconsistent amongst each other. Boards with hybrid memory interface (both DDR and SDRAM) and boards with DDR only were spotted and in general, there was just enough confusion to keep the discussion open without any product ever reaching the retail shelves. Aggravating the situation were early rumors about a new spin of the VIA KT266 chipset boosting performance to the levels of the AMD and ALi chipset that, thus far, were not possible to achieve with the VIA chipset.

By now, we know that VIA in fact did come out with a new chipset revision with deeper IOQ pipelines and the option of using 4 clock cycle transfer length for a burst of 8 bits per output pin as opposed to the earlier revision that carried over the original burst of 4 from the SDRAM version but squeezed it into 2 DDR cycles. This latter scheme of operation was the secret behind the lower performance of the VIA chipset since initial latencies were dis-proportionally high compared to the amount of data output unless the controller stayed in page.

After the introduction of the VIA KT266A chipset with all the improvements listed above, everyone still had to clear out their inventories which is why some of the smaller players are still listing their original KT266 boards as top models. Other companies either did not have inventory or else they moved enough volume to quickly replace the older chipset with the -A revision. ASUS, we don't know what they did but they were not the first to come out with a new board, those honors go to MSI and Shuttle, closely followed by EPoX.

Anyway, the ice is broken, play-time for the new ASUS A7V266-E which may or may not have some surprises.

next page:    => at one glance =>

Click Here!

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed