Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:
CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:








































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top page
ASUS K8V Specs
The Bundle
Memory Limits
VRM, Sound

Total Connectivity
BIOS
BIOS details
Test Configuration
Athlon64 3200+
Memory Bandwidth
Cachemem
I/O Performance
Winstones
3D Rendering
ViewPerf 7.0
CineBench, Flask
3Dmarks
UT2003, FFXI
X2, Comanche4, MDK2
Aquamark3
WiFi, Overclocking, Conclusions
Best Prices for Athlon 64 Processors
Give Us Some Feedback to Help Us Improve our Reviews

 AMD Athlon64 3200+ - ASUS K8V Deluxe
The Middle Grounds
(Review by MS, November 3, 2003)
K8V Deluxe At:
3D Rendering

We were using a number of different 3D Rendering programs, comprising Caligari TrueSpace 5.1, Amorphium 3.0 and 3ds max5. For Caligari, we used the Vase scene supplied by Adam Trachtenberg at 4 x AA; in Amorphium3, the Athlon64 FX-51 rendering scene at 1024x768 and in 3ds max, the CBalls, Single Pipe and Underwater Environment. Details regarding the different benchmarks are found in our Athlon 64 FX-51 review.


TrueSpace5.1

Runtime in seconds, lower is better: Surprisingly, the A64 scores relatively poorly, we reran the scene 5 times with identical results so we are confident about the validity of the score. On the other hand, A similar delta is found for the Granite Bay and the Canterwood chipsets, underscoring the importance of memory bandwidth in this particular application, especially with 4xAA selected.

Amorphium3

Runtime in seconds, lower is better: It is a very similar situation as above, the Athlon XP3200+ outperforms the Athlon64 3200+. Suffice it to say that overall, the performance is still very impressive and only the P4 Extreme Edition can keep up with the AMD processors

3ds max5

Runtime in seconds, lower is better:

Runtime in seconds, lower is better:

Runtime in seconds, lower is better: 3ds max5 is not too fond of AMD processors, however, the performance deltas between the XP3200+, the A64 3200+ and the FX-51 are reasonable.

next page:    => Viewperf 7.0 =>

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed