Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:
CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:








































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top Page
Mobile Specs
The DFI 855GME-MGF
Test Configurations
Memory Performance
WorldBench5
Sysmark2004
3ds max
Amporphium3, Lightwork, Cinebench
Cinebench2003 Realtime
Gaming Performance
Final Words

Your Comments Can Help Us Improve Our Reviews

 DFI 855GME-MGF and Intel Pentium M 735
Along came a Dothan
(Review by MS, Jan 2, 2005)

Amorphium3

Amorphium3 by Electric Image has grown to become my personal favorite 3D rendering program, it is inexpensive, intuitive and even though it may lack some of the sophistication of the real high-end programs, it suffices for any of the 3D rendering / raytracing I am interested in. In addition, Amorphium3 displays the runtime that it takes to render a given scene in milliseconds, which is extremely helpful whenever it comes to benchmarking. The scene rendered is fairly complex with a very high geometry count and semitransparent clouds (source file available upon request)


Runtime in seconds, shorter is better. Who said that the Dothan performs badly in 3D rendering? Quite the opposite is true, as soon as we move away from pre-defined objects such as tea-kettles and use complex geometry and lighting, the Pentium M actually dominates.

Lightwork Rendertest

Lightwork's rendertest is a fairly straightforward 3D rendering benchmark which usually seems to favor AMD processors.

Runtime in seconds, shorter is better.

Cinebench2003

Among the benchmarks within the Cinebench2003 suite is a raytracing 3D rendering scene that is dominated by HyperThreaded processors. There is something that is a bit strange about this since we have looked at other SMP enabled benchmarks where HyperThreading did not make a difference, that is, other than getting two separate scanlines, there was no runtime difference. Suffice it to say that we would like to take this particular benchmark with a grain of salt since theory and practice don't add up here.

The P4 dominates and the Northwood-based cores including the Galatin spin-off ExtremeEdition destroy everything, including the Prescott. Interestingly, the extra cache of the Extreme Edition does not seem to matter much either and clock for clock, the Banias is faster than the Dothan. In summary, we have some reservations about this benchmark.

Pentium M 735
(Dothan 1.7 GHz)

next page:    => CineBench2003 Real-Time Rendering =>

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed