|
Advice Beginners BIOS Guide CPUs Links Mainboards Memory Network Storage Video/Sound Cards Contact Forum SiteMap Sponsors WebNews Home |
. | . |
|
Prices: CPU Intel P4 2.4C-800 P4 2.6C-800 P4 2.8C-800 P4 3.0-800 P4 3.2-800 AMD AthlonXP XP 1700+ XP 2000+ XP 2400+ XP 2500+ XP 2700+ XP 3000+ XP 3200+ Athlon64 Athlon64 3200+ Athlon64 FX-51 Opteron Opteron 240 Opteron 242 Opteron 244 Opteron 246 Memory Corsair Crucial Kingston Mushkin OCZ |
LOSTCIRCUITS
|
|
| Foxconn C51XEM2AA The Way nVidia was Meant to Be Built | |
|
(Review by MS, July 17, 2006) |
| AMD Athlon64 x2-3800+ |
As mentioned earlier, for some reasons the trial version of 3dsmax 8.0 did not work on the C51, however, we have benchmark results for Caligari TrueSpace. Keep in mind that this type of application is primarily CPU-centric, meaning that the overall performance will not be influenced much by the memory performance.

It is "only" 3 % but 3 % on an otherwise identical platform are a tangible performance increase
3D Rendering - Cinebench 2003

Another CPU-centric benchmark, the C51 is faster but the difference is not that pronounced (~ 0.8% in favor of the C51).

OpenGL Hardware Rendering benefits mostly from memory latencies and nothing touches the FX60 on the DDR1 platform. on the AM2 platform, the C51 is once again roughly 2.5% faster.
| AMD Sempron 3600+ (AM2) |
| Foxconn CS51XEM2AA |
next page: => Gaming Performance =>
If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.