Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home
. .

Prices:
CPU
Intel
P4 2.4C-800
P4 2.6C-800
P4 2.8C-800
P4 3.0-800
P4 3.2-800

AMD
AthlonXP
XP 1700+
XP 2000+
XP 2400+
XP 2500+
XP 2700+
XP 3000+
XP 3200+

Athlon64
Athlon64 3200+
Athlon64 FX-51

Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

Search Prices:








































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top Page
At One Glance
Features
Quality, Layout
Integrated Peripherals, Connectors, BIOS
Test Setup, Overclocking
SiSoft Sandra
More Sandra
Gaming and Multimedia
Conclusion
Get Kt3 deals here!
 MSI KT3 Ultra Aru Deluxe Edition    
The proof is in the pudding..
(Review by MS, June 6, 2002)
Expendable Timedemo

We ran Expendable at 133/166 and 166/166 MHz (CPU/memory bus) at 12.5 x 133 and 10 x 166 MHz for 1667 MHz in both cases. The average frame rates increased from 157 to 166 fps at the higher bus speed


A roughly 6% performance increase at the same clock speed is quite impressive for Expendable

One question is how the KT3 compares to the competition in form of the Shuttle AK35GT2 and the ASUS A7V333. There is only one way to find out which is to run it with the same CPU (in this case the XP2100+) at the most aggressive timing settings, that is, in this case we set the "Fast Command" to Ultra to squeeze out the last bit of performance

The KT3 and its competitors are pretty much in a dead race here.

One question is how the KT3 compares to the competition in form of the Shuttle AK35GT2 and the ASUS A7V333. There is only one way to find out which is to run it with the same CPU (in this case the XP2100+) at the most aggressive timing settings, that is, in this case we set the "Fast Command" to "Ultra" to squeeze out the last bit of performance

Quake3 Arena

The grandmother of all gaming benchmarks shows the MSI KT3 trailing by about 2%. Nothing to write home about, though, I mean the performance difference.

All three boards show excellent performance in Quake3 Arena (PR1.3, demo_four) at the "Normal" 640 x 480 x 16 bpp setting.

Content Creation Winstone 2001

One caveat here is that the KT3 was using the Maxtor drive, whereas the two other contenders were using the IBM GXP60 Deskstar. Fact is that all three boards perform within the same league.

Not much of a difference here either.

next page:    => Conclusion =>

Click here! If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed